期刊文献+

从众行为的动物模型及其机制研究进展 被引量:1

Research progress on animal models of conformity and underlying mechanism
原文传递
导出
摘要 从众指个体受到外界人群行为影响时,其知觉、判断、认识上表现出来的符合公众舆论或多数成员的一种行为方式,是个体社会化的重要途径,也是包括酒精依赖等精神疾病发生发展的影响因素。建立便捷、可靠的从众行为研究模型,对揭示从众现象的发生机制、构建良好的社会秩序具有重要的意义。从众行为影响因素众多,发生机制复杂,随着神经科学、心理学等学科领域研究者对从众行为的关注逐渐广泛,从众行为的相关研究也获得了一系列重要发现。本文综述了常用从众行为研究的动物模型、影响因素和发生机制,以期为后续从众行为研究提供有益参考。 Conformity behavior mainly refers to a kind of behavior mode which accords with public opinion or most members when the individual is affected by the behavior of the outside crowd, and this behavior is an important way of individual socialization. Increasing evidence indicated that conformity is a factor influencing ethanol preference in rats and ethanol use disorder in human. Establishing a convenient and reliable conformity behavior research model and revealing its underlying mechanism have great significance for maintaining a good social order and building a harmonious society. It is well accepted that the underlying mechanism of conformity behavior is very complex and is influenced by numerous factors. Recently, more and more attention has been paid to elucidate the precise mechanism and the influencing factors of conformity. In the present review, several conformity animal models and the main findings about the underlying mechanisms of conformity were reviewed.
作者 赵烨 杨振邦 郝颖 李雯淑雅 史海水 ZHAO Ye;YANG Zhenbang;HAO Ying;LI Wenshuya;SHI Haishui(Neuroscience Research Center,Institute of Medical and Health Science of HeBMU,Hebei Medical University,Shijiazhuang,050017yChina)
出处 《中国药物依赖性杂志》 CAS CSCD 2021年第6期407-411,共5页 Chinese Journal of Drug Dependence
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(81771462) 河北省杰出青年基金项目(H2018206119) 河北医科大学大学生创新性实验项目(USIP2018069,USIP2020008) 河北省高校百名优秀创新人才支持计划(SLRC2019047)。
关键词 从众行为 动物模型 行为学 激素 脑区 conformity animal model ethology hormone brain region
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献193

  • 1宋官东.对从众行为的再认识[J].心理科学,2002,25(2):202-204. 被引量:39
  • 2袁力勇,戴体俊,苏珍,葛源.跳台实验训练后小鼠自然遗忘时间的观察[J].徐州医学院学报,2007,27(2):84-85. 被引量:15
  • 3Acker, F. (2008). New findings on unconscious versus conscious thought in decision making: Additional empirical data and meta-analysis. Judgment and Decision Making, 3(4), 292-303.
  • 4Ader, D. N., Johnson, S. B., Huang, S. W., & Riley, W. J. (1991). Group size, cage shelf level, and emotionality in non-obese diabetic mice: Impact on onset and incidence of IDDM. Psychosomatic Medicine, 53(3), 313-321.
  • 5Agor, W. H. (1986). The logic of intuition: How top executives make important decision. Organizational Dynamics, 14(3), 5-18.
  • 6Agor, W. H. (1989). Leading and managing productively. In W. H. Agor (Ed.), Intuition in organizations (p. 285). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publication.
  • 7Altsbuler, E., Ramos, O., Nfifiez, Y., Fern:indez, J., Batista-Leyva, A. J., & Noda, C. (2005). Symmetry breaking in escaping ants. The American Naturalist, 166(6), 643-649.
  • 8Bargh, J. A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. In R. S. Wyer, & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (pp. 1-40). Hillsdale, N J: Erlbaum.
  • 9Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462-479.
  • 10Betsch, T., & Haberstroh, S. (2005). Current research onroutine decision making: Advances and prospects. In T. Betsch, & S. Haberstroh (Eds.), The routines of decision making (pp. 359-376). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publisher.

共引文献13

同被引文献12

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部