期刊文献+

收入不平等下的零加成改革——医生策略反应与医疗支出再分配

ZERO MARK-UP REFORM UNDER INCOME INEQUALITY——Physicians’Strategic Response and the Reallocation of Medical Expenditure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文主要研究药品零加成改革引起的医疗支出在病情间的再分配效应。首先,本文利用中国健康与养老追踪调查进行双重差分分析,讨论改革对医疗支出在病情间分配的影响。回归结果显示,地区平均药占比每增加10个百分点,病情严重程度等于均值的患者的总治疗费用将显著上升5.13%。在此基础上,病情严重程度每增加1个标准差,患者的总治疗费用将少增加2.98%。进一步,本文在患者收入、病情二维异质性的框架下讨论了这种现象可能的成因并从实证上进行验证。分析表明,改革提高了对重症更有益的诊疗手段的相对价格,改变了医生在诊疗方案上的选择。这种改变会因患者的支付能力不同而有差异,相比收入低且病情较重的患者,医生更多地对收入高且病情较轻的患者使用了对重症更有益的诊疗手段。这种微观选择引起了医疗资源在病情间的扭曲配置和医疗支出向轻病的倾斜。 This paper focuses on how zero mark-up reform changes the allocation of medical expenditure among different diseases.In the first place,this paper uses four waves of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study(CHARLS)data to conduct a difference-in-difference analysis to identify the redistribution effect of medical expenditure allocation among different diseases.The results show that,after the reform,a ten-percent rise in regional drug sale reliance will make the medical expenditure of an average patient increase by 5.13%.However,a one-standard deviation increase in the patient’s severity will make the increase of his total expenditure decrease by 2.98%.Secondly,this paper discusses and tests empirically the possible causes of this phenomenon under the framework of two-dimensional heterogeneity in income and severity.The paper shows that the zero-markup reform increases the relative price of treatments that are more suitable for severe conditions and therefore encourages physicians to overuse them.However,the usage of these treatments is quite different among patients with different income levels.High-income patients with milder conditions are more likely to use them,but low-income patients with more severe conditions are relatively less likely to use them.This micro mechanism leads to the misallocation of medical resources among different conditions.
作者 倪夏 叶初升 NI Xia;YE Chusheng(School of Economics,Southwest University of Political Science&Law;School of Economics and Management,Wuhan University)
出处 《经济理论与经济管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第2期84-100,共17页 Economic Theory and Business Management
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目(16ZDA006)的资助。
关键词 收入不平等 药品零加成 相对价格变化 病情 医疗支出 income inequality zero mark-up reform relative price change severity of diseases medical expenditure
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献56

  • 1朱云峰.医院分级管理对提高医疗服务质量作用的评价与分析[J].中国医院统计,1996,3(2):104-105. 被引量:2
  • 2李卫平.公立医院的体制改革与治理[J].江苏社会科学,2006(5):72-77. 被引量:40
  • 3朱恒鹏.医疗体制弊端与药品定价扭曲[J].中国社会科学,2007(4):89-103. 被引量:179
  • 4中国社会科学院工业经济研究所课题组,吕政,金碚.对南京医药“药房托管”新模式的分析[J].中国工业经济,2007(8):114-121. 被引量:18
  • 5Coscelli,A.2000.“The Importance of Doctors’and Patients’Preferences in the Prescription Decision.”Journal of IndustrialEconomics,48(3):349-369.
  • 6Dulleck,U.,and R.Kerschbamer.2006.“On Doctors,Mechanics,and Computer Specialists:The Economics of Credence Goods.”Journal of Economic Literature,44(1):5-42.
  • 7Emons,W.2001.“Credence Goods Monopolists.”International Journal of Industrial Organization,19(3-4):375-389.
  • 8Hellerstein,J.1998.“The Importance of the Physician in the Generic versus Trade Name Decision.”Rand Journal of Economics,29(1):108-136.
  • 9Iizuka,T.2007.“Experts’Agency Problems:Evidence from the Prescription Drug Market in Japan.”Rand Journal of Economics,38(3):844-862.
  • 10Lundin,D.2000.“Moral Hazard in Physician Prescription Behavior.”Journal of Health Economics,19(5):632-662.

共引文献110

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部