期刊文献+

以CD54为评价指标的THP-1细胞光致敏体外评价方法的确定和验证 被引量:2

Identification and validation for in vitro photoallergy evaluation method of THP-1 cell with CD54 as evaluation index
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的确定并验证以细胞表面标志物CD54作为评价指标的光致敏体外评价方法。方法将THP-1细胞与多种光致敏剂、光刺激剂、皮肤致敏剂、皮肤刺激剂和阴性受试物分别孵育,在光照射或避光处理后,用流式细胞仪测定细胞表面标志物CD54和CD86的表达水平并统计分析,进一步确定具体的评价指标,并对该方法的准确性、特异性、灵敏度、重复性进行验证。结果19种光致敏剂中有15种引起照射组THP-1细胞表达CD54的平均荧光强度(MFI)较非照射组显著增加(P<0.05、0.01),且照射组细胞表达CD54的相对荧光强度(RFI)值均在1.5以上。光刺激剂经光照射后也可引起细胞表达CD54的MFI显著增加(P<0.01),但经过预照射处理后,CD54的表达水平较直接照射组显著下降(P<0.01)。未经光照射条件下,皮肤致敏剂即可引起THP-1细胞表达CD54和CD86的MFI比对照组显著增加(P<0.01),光照后CD54的表达反而略有下降。在光照和避光条件下,皮肤刺激剂、阴性受试物(乳酸)均未引起细胞表达CD54或CD86的显著性变化。以CD54为评价指标的THP-1细胞光致敏评价方法检测光致敏剂的准确性、特异性和灵敏度分别是85.2%、100%和78.9%,具有良好的重复性。结论确定了THP-1细胞光致敏评价方法的细胞表面标志物评价指标为CD54,判定标准为:(1)光照后THP-1细胞表达CD54的MFI较照射前显著性增加;(2)光照后THP-1细胞表达CD54的RFI≥1.5;(3)当上述条件均满足时,对受试物进行预照射处理,结果仍然满足前2条标准。 Objective To identify and validate an in vitro photoallergy evaluation method with cell surface markers as research indicators.Methods THP-1 cells were incubated with a variety of photoallergy agents,photoirritants,skin sensitizers,skin irritant and negative subject respectively.After solar radiation or non-radiation treatment,the expression changes of cell surface markers CD54 and CD86 were detected by flow cytometry and analysed to confirm the specific evaluation indicators and to validate the accuracy,specificity,sensitivity and repeatability of the method.Results Among the 19 photoallergy agents,15 induced a significant increase in the mean fluorescence intensity(MFI)of CD54 expressed in THP-1 cells in the irradiated groups compared with the nonirradiated groups(P<0.05 and 0.01),and the relative fluorescence intensity(RFI)of CD54 in THP-1 cells in the irradiated groups were all above 1.5.The photoirritants also induced the significant increase in CD54 MFI of THP-1 cells after solar irradiation(P<0.01),but the expression level of CD54 was significantly decreased after pre-irradiation treatment compared with direct irradiation group(P<0.01).Without solar radiation,the expression levels of CD54 and CD86 in THP-1 cells incubated with the two skin sensitizers were significantly increased compared with control group(P<0.01),while the expression of CD54 was slightly decreased after irradiation.Both skin irritants and negative subject did not cause the significant change in CD54 and CD86 expression under solar irradiation and in the dark conditions.In this study,the accuracy,specificity and sensitivity of the photoallergy evaluation method using THP-1 cells with CD54 as the evaluation index was 85.2%,100%and 78.9%respectively,and the method had good repeatability.Conclusion The cell surface marker evaluation index of THP-1 cell photoallergy evaluation method was determined as CD54,and the evaluation criteria were as follows:(1)MFI of THP-1 cells expressing CD54 increased significantly after irradiation compared with before irradiation,(2)The RFI of CD54 expression in THP-1 cells after irradiation was≥1.5,(3)When all the above conditions are met,the test materials are pre-irradiated,and the results still meet the first two standards.
作者 董建欣 黄舒佳 王宇 姜华 赵华琛 祝清芬 刘丽 李波 DONG Jianxin;HUANG Shujia;WANG Yu;JIANG Hua;ZHAO Huachen;ZHU Qingfen;LIU Li;LI Bo(Shandong Institute for Food and Drug Control,Jinan 250101,China;Key Laboratory of Beijing for Nonclinical Safety Evaluation Research of Drugs,National Center for Safety Evaluation of Drugs,Naional Institutes for Food and Drug Control,Beijing 100176,China;Center for Drug Evaluation,National Medical Products Administration,Beijing 100022,China)
出处 《药物评价研究》 CAS 2022年第1期20-29,共10页 Drug Evaluation Research
基金 国家“重大新药创制”科技重大专项资助项目“创新药物非临床安全性评价研究关键技术”(2018ZX09201017)。
关键词 光致敏 THP-1细胞 CD54 CD86 平均荧光强度 相对荧光强度 方法学验证 photoallergy THP-1 cell CD54 CD86 mean fluorescence intensity relative fluorescence intensity methodology validation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献57

  • 1楼小航,张福仁,田洪青,张虹.54例面部皮炎患者斑贴试验和光斑贴试验临床分析[J].中国麻风皮肤病杂志,2005,21(5):377-378. 被引量:6
  • 2王丽英,常宝珠,陈昆,顾恒,郑家润.慢性光线性皮炎的光斑贴试验和斑贴试验[J].中华皮肤科杂志,2005,38(6):335-337. 被引量:11
  • 3霍艳,李波.ICH免疫毒性评价指导原则介绍[J].中国药事,2006,20(10):634-636. 被引量:1
  • 4霍艳,李波.药物免疫毒性评价技术要求的国内外进展[J].中国药学杂志,2006,41(20):1525-1529. 被引量:10
  • 5Harber LC, Targovnik SE, Baer RL. Contact photosensitivity patterns to halogenated salicylanilides in man and guinea pigs[ J]. Arch Dermatol, 1967, 96(6): 646-656.
  • 6Horio T. ( 1976 ) The induction of photocontact sensitivity in guinea pigs without UVB radiation [ J ]. J Invest Dermatol, 1976, 67 (5) : 591-593.
  • 7Ichikawa H, Armstrong RB, Harber LC. Photoallergic contact dermatitis in guinea pigs: improved induction technique using Freund's complete adjuvant[J]. J Invest Dermatol, 1981, 76(6) : 498-501.
  • 8Kochever IE, Zalar GL, Einbinder J, Harber LC. Assay of contact photosensitivity to musk ambrette in guinea pigs[ J]. J Invest Dermatol, 1979, 73(2): 14445.
  • 9Harber LC, Baer RL. Pathogenic mechanisms of drug - induced photosensitivity[J]. J Invest Dermatol, 1972, 58(6) : 327-342.
  • 10Kaidbey KH, Kligman AM. Photocontact allergy to 6 - methylcoumarin [J]. Contact Dermatitis, 1978, 4(5) : 277-282.

共引文献11

同被引文献16

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部