期刊文献+

术后并发症标准化报告及评估工具的研究进展 被引量:5

Research Updates:Standardized Reporting and Evaluation Instruments for Postoperative Complications
原文传递
导出
摘要 术后并发症是评估手术结果的重要指标,通常使用死亡率和各种特定并发症的发病率来衡量手术及围术期管理策略的疗效。随着医学技术的进步,死亡率及单一并发症的发病率已经大幅下降,传统的报告及评估方法不能满足现实需要,迫切需要符合实际情况,反映患者术后整体并发症负担的标准化报告及评估工具,本文就术后并发症的标准化报告及评估工具Clavien-Dindo分级(Clavien-Dindo classification,CDC)系统和综合并发症指数(comprehensive complication index,CCI)的研究进展做一综述,并对CCI和CDC的改进空间及应用前景进行了展望。 Postoperative complications are important indicators for evaluating surgical outcomes,and mortality and the incidence of various specific complications are often used to measure the efficacy of surgical and perioperative management strategies.With the progress of medical technology,there has been a dramatic decline in mortality and the incidence of complications.As a result,reporting and evaluation in the traditional methods no longer meets the actual needs of the world.There has arisen an urgent need for an instrument of standardized reporting and evaluation.The instrument should be aligned with the actual circumstances and should represent the patient’s overall burden of postoperative complications.We herein reviewed the latest research findings on Clavien-Dindo Classification(CDC)system and comprehensive complication index(CCI),two instruments of standardized reporting and evaluation of postoperative complications,and discussed the space for improvement and prospects of application of CDC and CCI.
作者 朱易豪 王飞 赵怡 朱涛 ZHU Yi-hao;WANG Fei;ZHAO Yi;ZHU Tao(Department of Anesthesiology,West China Hospital,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610041,China;Department of Anesthesiology,Sichuan Academy of Medical Science and Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital,University of Electronic Science and Technology of China,Chengdu 610041,China)
出处 《四川大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2022年第2期342-348,共7页 Journal of Sichuan University(Medical Sciences)
基金 “十三五”国家重点研发计划项目(No.2018YFC2001800)资助。
关键词 不良事件 术后并发症 Clavien-Dindo分级 综合并发症指数 评估工具 Adverse event Postoperative complication Clavien-Dindo classification Comprehensive complication index Evaluating instrument
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献67

共引文献118

同被引文献35

引证文献5

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部