民事诉讼证明妨碍研究

Research on the Obstruction of Proof in Civil Procedures

我国证明妨碍制度仍处于起步阶段,《最高人民法院关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》第95条可以视为我国民事证明妨碍的总则性规定,但该规定依然过于笼统,从内容上讲依旧存在缺乏完整性、操作性不强以及法律效果过于单一等问题,已经无法很好地指导司法实践。因此,有必要对证明妨碍所涉及的基本理论予以研究,为我国证明妨碍制度的设计和适用提供明晰的思路和理论基础。应将诚实信用原则作为证明妨碍的根据,适当扩大证明妨碍行为主体,在自由心证的指导下,多元配置法律效果。

The article 95 of the Some Provisions on Evidence in Civil Procedures can be regarded as the general regulation of civil obstruction of proof in China,but the regulation is still too general,and there are still problems such as lack of completeness,operational ambiguity and too single legal effect,which can no longer guide judicial practice well.Therefore,it is necessary to study the basic theory involved in the obstruction of proof,and provide clear ideas and theoretical basis for the design and application of the obstruction of proof system in China.The principle of honesty and credibility should be taken as the basis for proving obstruction,the subject of obstruction of proof should be appropriately expanded,and the legal effects should be configured in a diversified manner under the guidance of judicial discretion.