摘要
利用文献计量的方法,以CNKI数据库收录的2004-2020年科技期刊知识服务领域的学术文献为研究对象,计量分析我国科技期刊知识服务研究现状.从时间分布结果可以看出,我国科技期刊知识服务研究最早开始于2004年,尽管我国科技期刊知识服务领域的研究逐渐受到重视,但是我国科技期刊知识服务领域的发文量整体偏低,年度峰值也仅为38篇;大部分科技期刊知识服务的论文都发表在出版类权威期刊上,高发文量的相关研究机构中,研究院、杂志社等非高校机构占比较大,出版从业者居多;关键词共现图谱可以看出,目前我国科技期刊知识服务领域研究的关键词较为集中,除去科技期刊、知识服务,媒体融合出现的频次最高.融媒体时代,科技期刊应树立以用户为中心的知识服务理念,运用新型技术工具为用户提供精准服务,从而提升科技期刊的社会效益和经济效益.
Based on bibliometric analysis,taking the academic literature in the field of knowledge service of scientific journals from 2004 to 2020 included in CNKI database as the research object,the research status of knowledge service of scientific journals in China is analyzed.It can be seen from the time distribution results that the research on knowledge service of scientific journals in China began in 2004.Although the research in the field of knowledge service of scientific journals in China has been paid more and more attention,the overall number of papers in the field of knowledge service of scientific in China is still low,and the annual peak is only38;Most of these papers are published in publishing authoritative journals.Among the relevant research institutions with a great number of documents,research institutes and magazines account for a large proportion.Most of them are publishing practitioners.It can be seen from the key words co-occurrence map that at present,the research key words in the field of knowledge service of scientific journals in China are relatively concentrated.Excluding scientific journals and knowledge service,the frequency of media integration is the highest.In Financial Media Era,scientific journals should establish the concept of user-centered knowledge service,and use new technical tools to provide accurate services for users,so as to improve the social and economic benefits of scientific journals.
作者
陈托兄
CHEN Tuoxiong(Editorial Department of Journal,Bohai University,Jinzhou 121013,China)
出处
《渤海大学学报(自然科学版)》
CAS
2021年第4期380-384,共5页
Journal of Bohai University:Natural Science Edition
关键词
科技期刊
知识服务
文献计量
scientific journals
knowledge service
bibliometric