技术话语的历史时空:贝尔纳·斯蒂格勒的叙事之场

The Historical Time and Space of Technological Discourse:On Bernard Stigler’s Field of Narratives

在晚近法国左翼的技术批判思潮中,贝尔纳·斯蒂格勒因其对历史时空的基本向度的聚焦而独具一格。尽管具有语言学解构风格,但由于强调历史时空的现实性,斯蒂格勒并不排斥经验层面的要素,反而力图颠覆同时期盛行的所谓技术语言结构“晦暗不明”从而无法被认知的观点。以此为基础,斯蒂格勒认为前现代与现代性之间的关系是“褶皱”而非断裂,现代技术话语的突变是内在于现实场景中的有迹可循的现象。总体来看,马克思和尼采的传统共在于斯蒂格勒的叙事之场,斯蒂格勒技术反思的深层次逻辑体现为在追求“拆解”后的谱系学式的本真样态与基于现实生产展开批判之间力求平衡,但并未真正摆脱晚近社会批判理论在话语坐标上摇摆不定的叙事困境。

Among the recent technological critiques of the French left,Bernard Stigler is unique because of his focus on the fundamental dimensions of historical time and space.Despite his linguistic deconstruction style,due to his emphasis on the reality of historical time and space,Stigler did not exclude the elements of experience,but tried to subvert the so-called technical language structure that prevailed at the time which was “obscure” and could not be recognized.Based on this,Stigler believes that the relationship between premodernity and modernity is a “fold” rather than a rupture,and that the mutation of modern technological discourse is a traceable phenomenon inherent in the real scene.In summary,the traditions of Marx and Nietzsche coexist in Stigler’s narrative field,and the deep logic of Stigler’s technical reflection is reflected in the genealogical authenticity and reality-based production after the pursuit of “disassembly”.Criticism strives for a balance,but does not really get rid of the narrative dilemma of recent social critical theory swinging on the discourse coordinates.