中国数学学科突破性引用评价论文循证分析

Recognition of Highlight Mathematic Papers of China Based on the Analysis of Breakthrough Descriptions in Citing Sentences

[目的/意义]以引用内容中突破性评价句为证据,识别我国数学领域近10年来获得同行认可的突破性论文。[方法/过程]利用CiteOpinion工具开展引用句抽取、突破性评价识别、贡献点识别、正/负向引用句识别以及相关指标的计算,统计分析了获得突破性评价论文的机构分布、学科研究方向、引用评价句证据等内容。[结果/结论]近10年来,我国数学领域取得了一系列获得同行认可的高水平研究成果(突破性评价论文占比0.53%),突破性评价论文与被引数量没有线性关系,在学科研究方向上,应用数学方向的突破性论文平均数高于基础数学。

[Objective/Significance] The paper aims to recognize highlight mathematic papers which gained breakthrough descriptions from peers in citing sentences in the past 10 years in China. [Method/Process] We used CiteOpinion platform to identify citation sentences, breakthrough descriptions, academic contributions,positive/negative citations, and some relevant indicators. We also analysed the statistic results of institution distributions and the discipline research directions of highlight papers. [Results/Conclusions] In the past 10 years, China has made some high-level academic achievements which were recognized by peers of Mathematics(breakthrough comment citing papers account for 0.53%). There is no linear relationship between the numbers of breakthrough-description citation papers and their citation numbers. From the view of mathematic research directions, the average number of breakthrough-description citation papers in application mathematics field is higher than that in basic mathematics field.