期刊文献+

经颅交流电刺激联合抗抑郁药对抑郁发作的疗效及安全性 被引量:2

Efficacy and safety of transcranial alternating-current stimulation combined with antidepressants in the treatment of depressive episode
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨经颅交流电刺激(transcranial alternating-current stimulation,tACS)联合抗抑郁药对抑郁发作的治疗效果及安全性。方法选择抑郁发作患者62例,分为治疗组和对照组,均服用抗抑郁药物,治疗组加用tACS真刺激治疗,对照组加用tACS伪刺激治疗。治疗次数两组均为20次。治疗部位为前额部、双侧乳突部,频率为77.5 Hz,强度为15 mA。采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表-17项(Hamilton Depression Scale-17 Item,HAMD-17),汉密尔顿焦虑量表(Hamilton Anxiety Scale,HAMA)评估患者治疗前后的临床症状,并评估安全性。评估时间点为基线,治疗结束时(4周末),随访时(8周末)。结果采用重复测量方差分析对治疗组和对照组在基线、治疗4周末、随访8周末时HAMD-17和HAMA的评分进行比较,显示两组HAMD-17总分均随治疗及随访时间的延长逐渐降低(P时间<0.05),治疗组降低幅度大于对照组(P组间<0.05),且随观察时间的延长治疗的效应增大(P交互<0.05)。两组HAMA总分均随治疗及随访时间的延长逐渐降低(P时间<0.05),但两组间差异无统计学意义(P组间>0.05)。治疗组和对照组第4周末HAMD-17的减分率分别为74.29%±8.40%vs 32.54%±13.30%;第8周末HAMD-17的减分率分别为81.00%±10.68%vs 40.27%±12.92%,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001)。两组均无严重不良事件发生。结论经颅交流电刺激联合抗抑郁药物治疗抑郁发作能够增强治疗效果,且安全性高,可作为抑郁发作联合治疗的新选择。 Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of transcranial alternating current stimulation(tACS)combined with antidepressants in the treatment of depression.Methods Sixty-two patients with depressive episode were randomly divided into treatment group and control group.Both groups took antidepressants.The patients in the treatment group received real tACS while the patients in the control group were treated with sham tACS.The treatment session was 20 times in both groups.The treatment site was prefrontal and bilateral mastoid,with a frequency of 77.5 Hz and intensity of 15 mA.Hamilton Depression Scale-17 Item(HAMD-17)and Hamilton Anxiety Scale(HAMA)were used to evaluate the clinical symptoms at baseline,the end of treatment(4 weeks),and follow-up(8 weeks).Results The scores of HAMD-17 and HAMA in the treatment and control groups at baseline,4 weeks of treatment,and 8 weeks of follow-up were compared with repeated measurement analysis of variance.The total score of HAMD-17 in the two groups decreased gradually with the extension of treatment and follow-up time(P time<0.05).The decrease in the treatment group was greater than that in the control group(P group<0.05),and the effect of treatment increased with the extension of observation time(Pinteraction<0.05).The total score of HAMA in both groups decreased gradually with the extension of treatment and follow-up time(P time<0.05).However,there was no significant difference between the two groups(P group>0.05).The score reduction rates of HAMD-17 in the treatment and control groups at the end of the fourth week were 74.29%±8.40%vs 32.54%±13.30%,respectively.At the end of the 8th week,the score reduction rates of HAMD-17 were 81.00%±10.68%vs 40.27%±12.92%,respectively.The difference was statistically significant(P<0.001).Conclusion tACS combined with antidepressants is effective and safe in the treatment of depressive episodes.It can be used as a new choice for the combined treatment of depressive episodes.
作者 罗炯 孙丛丛 潘伟刚 王丹 史晓宁 王茜 金文青 梁立荣 杨春林 马辛 任艳萍 Luo Jiong;Sun Congcong;Pan Weigang;Wang Dan;Shi Xiaoning;Wang Qian;Jin Wenqing;Liang Lirong;Yang Chunlin;Ma Xin;Ren Yanping(Department of Psychiatry, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders & The National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, Beijing 100088, China;Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069,China;Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China)
出处 《首都医科大学学报》 CAS 北大核心 2022年第2期244-248,共5页 Journal of Capital Medical University
基金 北京市科学技术委员会科技重大专项(D171100007017001)。
关键词 经颅交流电刺激 抑郁发作 疗效 安全性 transcranial alternating-current stimulation(tACS) depressive episode efficacy safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献15

  • 1石其昌,章健民,徐方忠,费立鹏,许毅,傅永利,顾卫,周夏江,王淑敏,张滢,俞敏.浙江省15岁及以上人群精神疾病流行病学调查[J].中华预防医学杂志,2005,39(4):229-236. 被引量:297
  • 2World Health Organization. Composite International Diagnostic Interviewl. O: clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines.Geneva: WHO, 1990: 1-956.
  • 3Vazquez-Barquero JL, Diez-Manrique JF, Pena C, et al. A community mental health survey in Cantabria : a general description of morbidity. Psychol Med, 1987, 17:227-241.
  • 4Lehtinen V, Lindholm T, Veijola J, et al. The prevalence of PSECATEGO disorders in a Finnish adult population cohort. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol, 1990, 25 : 187-192.
  • 5Meltzer H, Gill B, Petticrew M. OPCS surveys of psychiatric morbidty in Great Britain. Report 4 : the prevalence of psychiatric morbidity among aduits aged 16-64 living in a private household in Great Britain. London: OPCS social survey division, 1995:234- 276.
  • 6Thornicroft G, Sartorius N. The course and outcome of depression in different cultures: 10-year follow-up of the WHO collaborative study on the assessment of depressive disorders. Psychol Med, 1993, 23 : 1023-1032.
  • 7Croft-Jeffreys C, Wilkinson G. Estimated costs of neurotic disorder in UK general practice 1985. Psychol Med, 1989, 19:549-558.
  • 8Ormel J, VonKorff M, Ustun TB, et al. Common mental disorders and disability across cultures:results from the WHO collaborative study on psychological problems in general health care. JAMA, 1994, 272 : 1741-1748.
  • 9Murray CJ, Lopez AD. The global burden of disease: a comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries, and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020. Cambridge(USA) : Harvard University Press, 1996: 417-435.
  • 10殷大奎..消除偏见,勇于关爱,积极做好精神卫生工作..精神康复报,,2001-04-07(2)..

共引文献149

同被引文献4

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部