期刊文献+

高等教育腐败的社会影响因素研究——基于国别数据的模糊集定性比较分析 被引量:1

Research on the Social Influencing Factors of Higher Education Corruption—— An Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Fuzzy Sets on the Basis of Transnational Data
原文传递
导出
摘要 高等教育腐败的影响因素是社会各界共同关心的课题。随着高等教育重要性的提升,高等教育较之以往更容易受到社会的影响,因此将研究重点放在分析高等教育腐败的社会影响因素上。本研究以腐败的制度选择分析框架为理论基础,选取世界上60个国家为案例,运用模糊集定性比较分析确定了影响高等教育腐败的社会因素组合。结果表明,高等教育腐败的条件组合和高等教育清廉的条件组合之间具有非对称性;不同社会规则对高等教育腐败和高等教育清廉的影响力不同;法治完善程度和社会信任水平是高等教育腐败程度的基础性影响因素。研究结果呈现出高等教育腐败与社会因素之间多重并发的因果关系,并突显了将高等教育腐败治理纳入更大、更深远的社会经济发展战略之中的必要性。 Incentives of higher education corruption are the common concern of all sectors of society. With the increasing importance of higher education, higher education became more susceptible to social influence than ever before. Therefore, this study focuses on the analysis of social incentives of higher education corruption. Based on the Institutional Choice Analysis Framework of corruption, this study took 60 countries as cases and adopted the Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis to determine the configurations of variables affecting higher education corruption. The results show that: there is a asymmetry between the configurations of social incentives leading to higher education corruption and those maintaining higher education integrity;different social rules have different influence on corruption and integrity of higher education;the degree of rule of law improvement and the level of social trust are the basic social incentives affecting higher education corruption. This study presents the multiple concurrent causal relationships between social incentives and higher education corruption;and highlights the necessity of integrating the governance of higher education corruption into a larger and more far-reaching socio-economic development strategy.
作者 李谦 Li Qian
出处 《教育学术月刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第1期19-26,共8页 Education Research Monthly
关键词 高等教育 腐败 社会因素 模糊集定性比较分析 higher education corruption social factors fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献123

  • 1高奇琦.从单因解释到多因分析:比较方法的研究转向[J].政治学研究,2014(3):3-17. 被引量:17
  • 2夏鑫,何建民,刘嘉毅.定性比较分析的研究逻辑——兼论其对经济管理学研究的启示[J].财经研究,2014,40(10):97-107. 被引量:86
  • 3李少军.国际关系研究与诠释学方法[J].世界经济与政治,2006(10):7-13. 被引量:10
  • 4[美]詹姆斯·多尔蒂,小罗伯特·普法尔茨格拉夫著,阎学通,陈寒溪等译.《争论中的国际关系理论》.世界知识出版社,2003年版.第594页.
  • 5李子奈,潘文卿.《计量经济学》,高等教育出版社,2010年.
  • 6[美]S.利普舒尔茨,M.利普森.《离散数学》,周兴和,孙志人,张兴斌译,科学出版社2002年版,第374页.
  • 7Gary King, Robert O. Keohane and Sidney Verba, Designing Social Inquiry:Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research, Princeton University Press, 1994, Preface, III.
  • 8Detlef F. Sprinz and Yael Wolinsky-Nahmias," Introduction Methodology in International Relations Research," in Detlef F. Sprinz Yael Wolinsky-Nahmias, eds. , Models, Numbers, and Cases Methods for Studying International Rela- tions, Ann Arbor, MI : University of Michigan Press ,2004, pp. 6 7.
  • 9陈向明:《质的研究方法与社会科学研究》,教育科学出版社2014年版,第60页.
  • 10N.K. Denzin, "The Art and Politics of Interpretation, " in N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, eds. , Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks : Sage, 1994.

共引文献869

同被引文献37

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部