期刊文献+

Seed size-and density-related hidden treatments in common biodiversity experiments

原文传递
导出
摘要 Aims With a few exceptions,most well-known field biodiversity experiments on ecosystem functioning have been conducted in plant communities(especially grasslands)in which different numbers of species are planted as treatments.In these experiments,investigators have either kept the total seed weight or seed number constant across treatment plots.However,although in some cases attempts have been made to randomly choose species for planting from a designated species pool,the issue of possible‘hidden treatments’remains unsolved.Particularly,the total and relative abundance among species and across treatments could still affect the results.This study aims to determine whether treatments related to planted seed abundance and seed size may contribute to observed productivity.Methods We re-analyzed data from four biodiversity experiments based on a common seeding design(i.e.diversity treatments).Important Findings We show that diversity(richness)treatments usually involve a hidden treatment related to the planted seeds(i.e.weight,number and seed size)that ultimately affect plant density.Thus,the un-intended hidden treatment of seeding more seeds on more diverse plots contributes to the productivity to some degree.Such derivative but often neglected hidden treatments are important for further improvement of experimental design and have significant implications in ecological restoration.
作者 Qinfeng Guo
机构地区 USDA Forest Service
出处 《Journal of Plant Ecology》 SCIE 2011年第3期132-137,共6页 植物生态学报(英文版)
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献26

  • 1Tilman D, Lehman CL, Thomson KT (1997). Plant diversity and ecosystem productivity: theoretical considerations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,94, 1857- 1861.
  • 2Tilman D (1999). The ecological consequences of changes in biodiversity: a search for general principles. Ecology, 80, 1455 -1475.
  • 3Tilman D (2000). Causes, consequences and ethics of biodiversity.Nature, 405, 208 - 211.
  • 4Tilman D, Reich P, Knops J, Wedin D, Mielke T, Lehman C(2001). Diversity and productivity in a long-term grassland experiment. Science, 249, 843-845.
  • 5Vitousek PM, Hooper DU (1993). Biological diversity and terrestrial ecosystem biogeochemistry. In: Schulze ED, Mooney HA eds. Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function. Springer-Verlag Press,Berlin, Germany, 3- 14.
  • 6Wardle DA (1999). Is "sampling effect" a problem for experiments investigating biodiversity-ecosystem function relationships? Oikos,87,403-407.
  • 7Chapin Ⅲ FS, Moilanen L, Kielland K (1993). Preferential use of organic nitrogen for growth by a non-mycorrhizal arctic sedge.Nature, 361, 150- 153.
  • 8Diaz S, Cabido M (2001). Vive la difference: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 16, 646 - 655.
  • 9Dukes JS (2001). Productivity and complementarity in grassland microcosms of varying diversity. Oikos, 94,468 - 480.
  • 10Fridley JD (2001). The influence of species diversity on ecosystem productivity: how, where, and why? Oikos, 93, 514- 526.

共引文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部