期刊文献+

Ventilation strategies in burn intensive care:A retrospective observational study 被引量:2

原文传递
导出
摘要 Consensus regarding optimal burns intensive care(BICU)patient management is lacking.This study aimed to assess whether ventilation strategies,cardiovascular support and sedation in BICU patients have changed over time,and whether this affects outcome.A retrospective observational study comparing two 12-patient BICU cohorts(2005/06 and 2010/11)was undertaken.Demographic and admission characteristics,ventilation parameters,sedation,fluid resuscitation,cardiovascular support and outcome(length of stay,mortality)data were collected from patient notes.Data was analysed using T-tests,Fisher’s exact and Mann-Whitney U tests.In our study cohort groups were equivalent in demographic and admission parameters.There were equal ventilator-free days in the two cohorts 10±12.7 vs.13.3±12.2 ventilator free days;(P=0.447).The 2005/06 cohort were mechanically ventilated more often than in 2010/11 cohort(568 ventilator days/1000 patient BICU days vs.206 ventilator days/1000 patient BICU days;P=0.001).The 2005/06 cohort were ventilated less commonly in tracheostomy group/endotracheal tube spontaneous(17.8%vs.26%;P=0.001)and volumecontrolled modes(34.4%vs.40.8%;P=0.001).Patients in 2010/11 cohort were more heavily sedated(P=0.001)with more long-acting sedative drug use(P=0.001)than the 2005/06 cohort,fluid administration was equivalent.Patient outcome did not vary.Inhalational injury patients were ventilated in volume-controlled(44.5%vs.28.1%;P=0.001)and pressure-controlled modes(18.2%vs.9.5%;P=0.001)more frequently than those without.Outcome did not vary.This study showed there has been shift away from mechanical ventilation,with increased use of tracheostomy/tracheal tube airway spontaneous ventilation.Inhalation injury patients require more ventilatory support though patient outcomes do not differ.Prospective trials are required to establish which strategies confer benefit.
出处 《Burns & Trauma》 SCIE 2014年第1期29-35,共7页 烧伤与创伤(英文)
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献8

  • 1邓诗琳.烧伤后肺脏并发症[A].见:李鳌.烧治疗学[M].上海:科技出版社,2001.368-371.
  • 2Brochard L,Roudot-Thoraval F,Roupil E,et al.Tidal volume reduction for prevention of ventilator-induced lung injury in ARDS.Am J Respir Crit Care Med,1998,158:1831-1838.
  • 3Mancini M,Zavala E,Mancebo J,et al.Mechanisms of pulmonary gas exchange improvement during a protective ventilatory strategy in ARDS.Am J Respir Crit Care Med,2001,164:1448-1453.
  • 4Brower RG,Shanholt CB,Fessler HE,et al.Prospective,randomized,controlled clinical trial comparing traditional versus reduced tidal volume ventilation in ARDS.Crit Care Med,1999,27:1492-1498.
  • 5Amato MB,Barbas CS,Medeiros DM,et al.Effect of a protective-ventilation strategy on mortality in ARDS.N Engl J Med,1998,338:347-354.
  • 6Stocker R,Neff T,Stecr S,et al.Prone postioning and low-volume pressure-limited ventilation improve survival in patient with severe ARDS.Chest,1997,111:1008-1017.
  • 7Stewart TE,Meade MO,Cook DJ,et al.Evaluation of a ventilation strategy to prevent barotrauma in patient at high risk for ARDS:Pressure-and volume-limited ventilation strategy group.N Engl J Med,1998,338:355-361.
  • 8Eisner MD, Thompson T,Hudson LD,et al.Efficacy of low tidal volume ventilation in patients with different clinical risk factors for acute lung injury and the actue respiratory distress syndrome.Am J Respir Crit Care Med,2001,164:231-236.

共引文献21

同被引文献10

引证文献2

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部