期刊文献+

产出导向法下的大学英语课堂教学实践研究--以《新一代大学英语(提高篇1)》为例 被引量:1

A Study on Practice of College English Teaching Based on Production-oriented Approach--A Case Study of New Generation College English(Improvement 1)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 大学英语课程是高校人文教育的一部分,担负着培养学生跨文化交际能力的任务,对提高学生的综合素质、促进学生全面发展有着重要的作用。产出导向法的提出能够引领大学英语教学改革的新方向,为切实解决我国大学英语教学中存在的费时低效、学用分离等问题提供理论依据。将该理论的教学理念和教学流程应用于实际的大学英语教学,有助于改变传统的教学模式,打造创新课堂,提高学生的语言应用能力。 College English course is a part of humanities education in colleges and universities,which is responsible for cultivating students intercultural communication ability,and has an important influence on improving students comprehensive quality and promoting students all-round development.The production-oriented approach has led the college English teaching reform in a new direction,and provided a theoretical basis for solving the problems in China s college English teaching,such as time-consuming,inefficient,separation of learning and application.It is helpful for teachers to change the traditional teaching mode,create innovative classroom and improve students practical language application ability by applying it s teaching concept and teaching process to practical college English teaching.
作者 汪凤 WANG Feng(Department of Foreign Language,Lanzhou Technology and Business College,Lanzhou 730030,China)
出处 《林区教学》 2022年第4期77-81,共5页 Teaching of Forestry Region
基金 2020-2022年甘肃省高等院校外语教学研究项目“产出导向法对大学英语生态课堂建构的影响研究”(GSSKB20-19) 2020年度甘肃省高等教育教学成果培育项目“基于‘产出导向法’的英语听说一体化教学模式探究”(202008)。
关键词 产出导向法 大学英语教学 教学流程 教学反思 production-oriented approach college English teaching teaching process teaching reflection
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献35

  • 1王策三.论教师的主导作用和学生的主体地位[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),1983(6):70-76. 被引量:142
  • 2黄月圆,顾曰国.以学生为中心,多维一体的大学英语教学法[J].外语教学与研究,1996,28(2):9-13. 被引量:103
  • 3杨忠.培养技能 发展智能——外语教育工具性与人文性的统一[J].外语学刊,2007(6):133-137. 被引量:95
  • 4Larsen-Freeman, D. 2005. Teaching Language: From Grammar to Grammaring [M~. Bos- ton, MA:. Thomson Heinle.
  • 5Collins, J. & N. O'Brien (eds.). 2003. Greenwood Dictionary of Education ~-Z~. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
  • 6Hanten, G., X. Li, S. Chapman, P. Swank, J. Gamino, G. Roberson&H. Levin. 2007. De- velopment of verbal selective learning [J]. Developmental Neuropsychology 32 (1). 585-596.
  • 7Kirschner, P., J. Sweller & R. Clark. 2006. Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, expe- riential, and inquiry-based teaching [J]. Educational Psychologist 4(2) : 75-86.
  • 8Krashen, S. 1985. The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications I-M3. London: Longman.
  • 9Long, M. 1983. Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of com- prehensible input [J]. Applied Linguistics 4:126-141.
  • 10Long, M. 1996. The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition I-A3. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (eds.). Handbook of Second Language Acquisition [C3. SanDiego: Academic Press. 413-468.

同被引文献6

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部