摘要
目的 分析埋针治疗对变应性鼻炎的治疗效果。方法 本次研究选取时间范围在2020年3月~2021年3月之间,选取对象为180例与我院进行治疗的变应性鼻炎患者,根据治疗方式的不同将这180例患者分为两组,分别为90例应用盐酸左西替利嗪片进行药物治疗的对照组和90例应用埋针治疗的观察组。对比两组患者的临床治疗效果以及两组患者治疗前后的VAS评分和症状量化评分。结果 观察组患者的临床治疗效果比对照组更优,两组对比(P<0.05)。治疗前,两组患者的VAS评分对比(P>0.05);治疗后,两组患者的VAS评分均有所降低,组内对比P(<0.05);且治疗后观察组患者的VAS评分比对照组患者更优,两组组间对比(P<0.05)。治疗前,两组患者的症状量化评分对比(P>0.05);治疗后,两组患者的症状量化评分均有所降低,组内对比P(<0.05);且治疗后观察组患者的症状量化评分比对照组患者更优,两组组间对比(P<0.05)。结论 对变应性鼻炎患者进行治疗时,应用埋针治疗比药物治疗具有更高得临床治疗效果,能有效缓解患者的疼痛程度,降低患者的症状量化评分,具有较高的临床应用价值和推广意义。
Objective To analyze the effect of needle embedding therapy on allergic rhinitis. Method The selected time range for this study is between March 2020 and March 2021. The selected subjects are 180 patients with allergic rhinitis who were treated in our hospital. The 180 patients were divided into different treatment methods. The two groups were respectively a control group of 90 patients who were treated with levocetirizine hydrochloride tablets and an observation group of 90 patients who were treated with needle embedding. The clinical treatment effects of the two groups of patients and the VAS scores and symptom quantitative scores of the two groups before and after treatment were compared. Results The clinical treatment effect of the observation group was better than that of the control group, and the two groups were compared(P<0.05). Before treatment, the VAS scores of the two groups of patients were compared(P>0.05);after treatment, the VAS scores of the two groups of patients were reduced, and the intra-group comparison was P(<0.05);and the VAS scores of the observation group were compared with the control after treatment Group patients were better, the comparison between the two groups(P<0.05). Before treatment, the symptom quantification scores of the two groups were compared(P>0.05);after treatment, the symptom quantification scores of the two groups were reduced, and the intra-group comparison was P(<0.05);and the observation group’s symptoms were quantified after treatment The score was better than that of the control group, and the comparison between the two groups(P<0.05). Conclusion When treating patients with allergic rhinitis, the application of needle embedding therapy has a higher clinical therapeutic effect than drug therapy. It can effectively relieve the patient’s pain and reduce the patient’s symptom quantitative score. It has high clinical application value and Promotional meaning.
作者
王小英
张玲
Wang Xiaoying;Zhang Ling(Department of Otolaryngology,Yunnan Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Kunming,Yunnan,650021,China)
出处
《中国医学文摘(耳鼻咽喉科学)》
2022年第2期164-166,共3页
Chinese Medical Digest(Otorhinolaryngology)
关键词
埋针治疗
药物治疗
变应性鼻炎
治疗效果
VAS评分
症状量化评分
Needle embedding therapy
Drug therapy
Allergic rhinitis
Treatment effect
VAS score
Symptom quantitative score