半透明与准时间--技术论视角下的文学“意外”

Translucency and Quasi-Temporality:The Accident of Literature from the Perspective of Technical Theory

维利里奥的“意外/事故”指向“必然是别样”的激进姿态。技术“事故”中断人类经验中的既定幻象,而艺术“意外”则重塑主体观照世界的视线。文学作为书写技术,其“意外”关涉多重维度的知觉更迭。从外部效应看,文学技术的半透明性以技术世界的调解路径取代自然世界的对立模式,文学“意外”生成于知觉系统更迭之际。而在内部机制上,文学技术的准时间性调适读者的理解立场,解构时空对立的范式分野,揭示情节与意图的“均势妥协”,在时间与反时间的悖立中,文学的“意外”得以显现。

Accident,one of Paul Virilio's essential concepts,embodies his radical attitude that“it must be otherwise”.To be specific,the accident of technology interrupts the established illusion of eternal progress of human practice,and the accident of art reshapes our vision of the world.As a technique of writing,the accident of literature involves the transition of perception in different dimensions.In terms of external effects,the translucency of literary technique has paradoxical senses which are comprised of embodiment and otherness,so that the mediation approach of the technical world replaces the binary model of the natural world.Hence,the accident of literature emerges when the perceptual system alters.On the other hand,the inner logic of accident adjusts the recipient's attitudes towards the world of the literary texts.That is,the divisional paradigm of space-time is no longer reliable;instead,the dynamic vision of quasi-temporality reveals the compromise equilibrium between narratives and intentions.The accident of literature manifests itself in the tension between time and anti-time.