期刊文献+

美国太空安全政策的生成机制探究:基于利益传递的视角

The Mechanism for America’s Space Security Policy Formulation:From the Perspective of Interest Transmission
原文传递
导出
摘要 传统的利益诱导政治研究忽略了国家机构自身固有的意识形态影响,安全政策是不同部门利益诉求和意识形态相协调的产物。在美国太空安全决策的利益传递过程中,美国的太空商业联盟、国防联盟、太空科学联盟等社会力量,通过党派政治、选举政治、游说政治和公众政治等利益诱导过程,将利益诉求渗透到美国的海陆空军部、国家侦察局、国家航空航天局和国会等国家机构中。在部门利益和意识形态影响下,美国的这些国家机构通过决策咨询等将价值诉求传至美国国家安全委员会、国家太空委员会、国家科学技术委员会等最高决策机构。涉太空利益传递使得美国"战略防御倡议"逐步偏离预定轨道,项目效益难以乐观评估。 Traditional research on “pork barrel”politics ignores national institutions’ inherent ideological influence.A country’s security policy reflects the coordinated interests and ideologies of different departments and institutions. In the process of interest transmission,the interests of the advocacy coalitions of space business, defense,and space science are conveyed through political lobbying and electoral politics to various national institutions,including the US Armed Forces,the National Reconnaissance Office,the National Aeronautics,the Space Administration,and the Congress. Under the influence of departmental interests and ideology,these national institutions then spread their demands,through decision-making consultation,to the top decision-making advisory bodies such as the National Security Council,the National Space Council,the National Science,and the Technology Council.This chain of transmission of space-related interests has caused the Strategic Defense Initiative to deviate gradually from its intended track,and therefore,the outcomes of the program might not be optimistic.
作者 魏涵 Wei Han
出处 《国际政治研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第1期87-113,7,共28页 The Journal of International Studies
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献41

  • 1刘靖华,牛军,姜毅.论北约东扩——地缘政治与文明特性的双重分析[J].美国研究,1997,11(3):39-81. 被引量:12
  • 2Kenneth Waltz, Man the Sate and War (New York: Columbia University Press, 1959), p. 39, p. 28.
  • 3Quency Wright, The Study of International Relations (New York: Appleton, 1955), p.433.
  • 4Quoted in Jerel Rasati, "The Power of Human Cognition and Policymaker Beliefs in Foreign Policy and World Politics," manuscript.
  • 5James Rosenau, "Pre- Theory and Theory of Foreign Policy," in Approaches to Comparative and International Politics, R. Barry Farrell ed., (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1966), pp. 97-100.
  • 6Harold and Margaret Sprout, The Ecological Perspective on Human Affairs with Special Reference to International Politics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1965), p. 118, p. 224.
  • 7Ole R. Holsti, "The Belief System and National Images: A Case Study," in International Relations and Foreign Policy, ed. James Rosenau, (New York: Free Press, 1967), p. 548.
  • 8Alexander George "the Operational Code: A Neglected Approach to the Study of Political leader and Decision Making," International Studies Quarterly, 13, 2, (1969).
  • 9Jerel Rosati, "A Cognitive Approach in the Study of Foreign Policy," in Foreign Policy Analysis : Continuity and Change in Its Second Generation eds., Laura Neack et. al., (NJ: Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1995), p.57.
  • 10Davis B. Bobrow, "The Chinese Communist Conflict System," Orbis, 9 (Winter 1966).

共引文献71

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部