期刊文献+

最小临床意义差值的确定和应用 被引量:3

Determination of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Its Application
下载PDF
导出
摘要 最小临床意义差值(minimal clinically important difference,MCID)的常用估算方法包括效标法、分布法和文献分析法等。目前MCID的估算方法众多且不统一,给MCID的确定、结果解释和应用带来了困难。鉴于目前各种估算方法均存在一定局限,建议同时使用多种估算方法获得多个MCID初步估算值,并以效标法为主、其他方法为辅或将多种方法通过统计整合的估算值来确定最终的MCID。MCID可协助进行临床研究结果的临床意义判断、样本量估算以及临床决策等,在具体应用之前,应充分了解该MCID的估算方法和样本特征等相关细节以判断是否适用于所开展的研究或临床场景。 Common methods for ascertaining minimal clinically important difference(MCID)usually include anchor-based method, distribution-based method and literature analysis method. At present, the estimation methods of MCID are numerous and inconsistent,which brings difficulties to the determination,interpretation and application of MCID. In view of the limitations of all current estimation methods, it is recommended that multiple estimation methods can be used simultaneously to obtain multiple preliminary MCID estimates,and that the final MCID can be determined by using the anchor-based method as the primary method and the remaining methods as the secondary method or by statistically integrating the estimates from multiple methods. MCID can assist to interpret the clinical significance of the clinical research results,estimate the sample size,and make the clinical decision. For the application of MCID, fully understanding of the characteristics of the methods for ascertaining MCID and the sample size should be made firstly,so as to ensure the application of MCID meeting the research and clinical situation.
作者 杨丽虹 肖晶旻 刘少南 吴大嵘 葛龙 郭新峰 YANG Li-Hong;XIAO Jing-Min;LIU Shao-Nan;WU Da-Rong;GE Long;GUO Xin-Feng(The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine,Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Guangzhou 510120 Guangdong,China;Evidence-based Social Science Research Center,School of Public Health,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000 Gansu,China)
出处 《广州中医药大学学报》 CAS 2022年第4期959-965,共7页 Journal of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基金 国家重点研发计划项目(编号:2019YFC1709805) 广东省中医药局科研项目(编号:20201151)。
关键词 最小临床意义差值(MCID) 效标法 分布法 文献分析法 临床意义解释 样本量估算 临床决策 minimal clinically important difference(MCID) anchor-based method distribution-based method literature analysis method interpretation of the clinical significance estimation of the sample size clinical decision
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献39

  • 1Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt G H. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal chnically important difference[J]. Control ClinTrials, 1989, 10 (4): 407.
  • 2Bagenstose S E, Bernstein J A. Treatment of chronic rhinitis by an allergy specialist improves quality of life outcomes[J]. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 1999, 83 (6Pt 1): 524.
  • 3Schtinemann H J, Griffith L, Jaeschke R, et al. Evaluation of the minimal important difference for the feeling thermometer and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire in patients with chronic airflow obstruction[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2003, 56 (12): 1170.
  • 4van Stel H F, Maill6 A R, Colland V T, et al. Interpretation of change and longitudinal validity of the quality of life for respiratory illness questionnaire(QOLRIQ) in inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation [Jl- Qual Life Res, 2003, 12 (2): 133.
  • 5Li Yan, Xu Biyun, Chen Shuhui, et al. A randomized, controlled study of efficacy and safety on mild to moderate insomnia intervened by Chinese medicine in the integrated program [C] Bioinformatics and Biomedicine Workshops (BIBMW), 2011 IEEE International Conference: 732-739.
  • 6中华中医药学会亚健康分会.亚健康中医临床研究指导原则起草小组.亚健康中园临床研究指导原则(试行)[s].世界中医药学会联合会亚健康专业委员会首届世界亚健康学术大会论文集.2006:33-36.
  • 7World Health Organization. The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders. Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines[S]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1992.
  • 8Buysse D J, Reynolds C F 3rd, Monk T H, et al. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research[Jl. Psychiatry Res, 1989, 28 (2): 193.
  • 9Brozek J L, Guyatt G H, Schtinemann H J. How a well-groundedminimal important difference can enhance transparency of labeling claims and improve interpretation of a patient reported outcome measure[J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2006, 4: 69.
  • 10Revicki D A, Cella D, Hays R D, et al. Responsiveness and minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes [J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2006, 4: 70.

共引文献50

同被引文献44

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部