期刊文献+

疾病风险调整方法在病种精细化评价中的应用

Application of Disease Risk Adjustment Method in Fine Evaluation of Disease Groups
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的应用疾病风险调整方法,实现对各专科病种平均住院天数、次均费用等指标的合理预测,为病种管理提供依据。方法应用疾病风险调整方法对某三甲综合医院2016年-2019年住院患者出院病案首页信息进行挖掘,围绕O/E指数、AW、ACMI和ACMP等主要监测指标展开分析。结果通过疾病风险调整,ACMI、ACMP更加合理地展现了服务难度,应用O/E值实现了分时间、分科室、分病种设置指标合理目标值,同时解决了各科室、病种间监测指标的横向比较问题。结论疾病风险调整方法能够更加真实、客观地评价临床服务能力、服务效率及技术水平,但其有效程度取决于历史数据的真实性、完整性和准确性。 Objective To use the disease risk adjustment method to reasonable predict the average length of stay and the average cost per time of each disease in the hospital,so as to provide evidence for disease management.Methods The disease risk adjustment method was used to analyze the medical record homepage in a tertiary general hospital from 2016to 2019.The main monitoring indicators,including O/E index,AW,ACMI and ACMP,were analyzed.Results Through the disease risk adjustment,ACMI and ACMP reflected the service difficulty more reasonably.The application of O/E index realized the reasonable target value of indicators set by time,department and disease,and solved the horizontal comparability of monitoring indicators among departments and disease types.Furthermore,the problem of horizontal comparability of monitoring indicators among departments and diseases was solved.Conclusion The disease risk adjustment method can more truly and objectively evaluate clinical service ability,service efficiency and technical level,but the effectiveness depends on the authenticity,completeness and accuracy of historical data.
作者 张海悦 高关心 马尚寅 边雨桐 刘嘉吉 陈霞 ZHANG Haiyue;GAO Guanxin;MA Shangyin(不详;Inner Mongolia People’s Hospital,Hohhot,Inner Mongolia,010020,China)
出处 《中国卫生质量管理》 2022年第3期33-36,共4页 Chinese Health Quality Management
基金 2019年度内蒙古自治区人民医院院内基金项目“公立医院章程编制与实施研究”(2019YN26)。
关键词 疾病风险调整方法 医院 预测评价 Disease Risk Adjustment Method Hospital Prediction Assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献35

  • 1陆勇.澳大利亚疾病诊断相关分组预付费模式运作机制及效果评价[J].中国卫生资源,2011,14(5):343-345. 被引量:13
  • 2郑文,陈家应,陈险峰.医疗服务成本核算方法综述[J].中国医院,2007,11(6):60-63. 被引量:12
  • 3Hannan EL,Wu C,DeLong ER,et al. Predicting risk-adjusted mortalityfor CABG surgery : logistic versus hierarchical logistic models. MedCare,2005 ,43(7) :726-735.
  • 4Ding YY. Risk adjustment:towards achieving meaningful comparison ofhealth outcomes in the real world. Ann Acad Med Singapore, 2009,38(6):552-557.
  • 5Krumholz HM, Wang Y, Mattera JA, et al. An administrative claimsmodel suitable for profiling hospital performance based on 30-day mortal-ity rates among patients with heart failure. Circulation, 2006,113(13):1693-1701.
  • 6Krumholz HM,Chen J,Wang Y,et al. Comparing AMI mortality amonghospitals in patients 65 years of age and older : evaluating methods of riskadjustment. Circulation, 1999,99(23) :2986-2992.
  • 7Shahian DM,Torchiana DF,Shemin RJ,et al. Massachusetts cardiac sur-gery report card: implications of statistical methodology. Ann ThoracSurg,2005,80(6) :2106-2113.
  • 8Stukenborg GJ, Wagner DP, Harrell FE Jr,et al. Which hospitals havesignificantly better or worse than expected mortality rates for acute myo-cardial infarction patients. Improved risk adjustment with present-at-ad-mission diagnoses. Circulation,2007,116(25) :2960-2968.
  • 9侯常敏,吴倩.基于作业成本法的医疗项目成本管理[J].中国医院,2010,14(7):6-8. 被引量:10
  • 10简伟研,胡牧,简伟健,张修梅.基于“诊断相关组”评估医院诊疗技术的综合能力[J].中国医院管理,2010,30(8):17-19. 被引量:27

共引文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部