期刊文献+

明代状元殿试策的策对艺术

The Art of Response to Policy Inquiry of Top Scholars in Final Imperial Examination of Ming Dynasty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 作为明代科举考试最高层级的考试文体,殿试策论表层的话语方式与深层的文本结构关联着特定的政治文化结构。在政治话语权力的笼罩之下,士子要以进言方式达到资治效果,尤需讲究谋篇布局、论证方式、修辞技巧等策对艺术。明代状元殿试策论在颂美与讽喻总体平衡的前提下,表现出气盛言宜的书生意气;注重征经引史,酌古参今,形成博奥风貌和完整的逻辑结构;在具体对策的分析上,使用层次推衍的论证方式;行文风格简繁有致,铺排变化,呼应着明代科举文学与文化的风气变化趋势。 As the top-level examination style of the imperial examination in the Ming dynasty,the surface discourse mode of the response to the policy inquiry of top scholars and its deep text structure are related to the specific political and cultural structure.Under the influence of political discourse power,scholars needed to pay attention to the strategy and art of the layout,demonstration methods,rhetorical skills,etc.with a view to achieving the effect of governance in offering advice.On the premise of the overall balance between compliment and allegory,the response to the policy inquiry of the imperial examination of top scholars was supposed to show a positive scholar spirit;they emphasized collecting classics and introducing history,taking into account the past and the present,thereby forming a broad style and complete logical structure;in the analysis of specific countermeasures,the demonstration method of hierarchical derivation was used;the writing style was both simple or complicated with changes in the layout,thus echoing the changing trend of literature and cultural aura in the Ming dynasty imperial examination.
作者 彭娟 PENG Juan(School of Literature and Journalism,Hunan No.1 Normal College,Changsha,Hunan 410205)
出处 《绍兴文理学院学报》 2022年第3期17-25,共9页 Journal of Shaoxing University
基金 教育部人文社科青年基金项目“明代士人的知识结构——基于殿试策的实证研究”(19YJC751031)。
关键词 殿试策 明代 状元 策对 艺术 final imperial examination Ming dynasty Number One Scholar response to policy inquiry art of writing
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献17

  • 1陈飞.唐代试策的形式体制——以制举策文为例[J].文学遗产,2006(6):37-44. 被引量:11
  • 2洪本健.欧阳修诗文集校笺[M].上海:上海古籍出版社.2009.
  • 3苏轼.苏轼文集[M].北京:中华书局,1986..
  • 4徐松辑.宋会要辑稿[M].北京:中华书局,1957..
  • 5徐师曾.文体明辨序说[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1962..
  • 6俞兆鹏.文天祥《御试策》评介[J].安徽师范大学学报(社会科学版),2007,35(1):64-69. 被引量:2
  • 7胡仔.苕溪渔隐丛话·后集[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1962.
  • 8沈作拮.寓简[A].全宋笔记:第四编第五册[C].郑州:大象出版社,2008.
  • 9邓小南.邓小南谈宋史研究:宋王朝是“稳定至上”的时期[DB/OL].澎湃新闻,2014—11—30.http://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail—fof-ward——1281914.
  • 10金滢坤.试论唐代制举试策文体的演变[J].首都师范大学学报(社会科学版),2011(4):17-26. 被引量:6

共引文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部