低位小切口与传统甲状腺手术治疗甲状腺良性结节的疗效对比

Efficacy Comparison of Low Small Incision Surgery and Traditional Thyroid Surgery in Treatment of Benign Thyroid Nodules

目的:以甲状腺良性结节患者为研究对象,对其应用低位小切口手术方式和传统甲状腺手术方式,对比两种手术方式对患者所产生的治疗效果。方法:试验对象均患有甲状腺良性结节疾病,选取利津县盐窝中心卫生院于2018年12月-2020年12月收治的患者98例,按入院先后时间平均分为两组,各49例,一组命名为对照组(传统甲状腺手术治疗方式),另一组命名为试验组(低位小切口手术方式),对比两组治疗的各项指标。结果:从手术指标、治疗时间、疼痛评分、并发症发生率、治疗有效率五个方面来看,试验组的各项情况与对照组相比,都处于相对更为良好的状态,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:对甲状腺良性结节病而言,行低位小切口手术治疗方式,可缩短患者的插管和住院时间,减轻疼痛感,降低并发症发生率,取得的临床治疗有效率也相对较高,与传统甲状腺手术治疗方式相比优势更为显著。因此,在可临床治疗中大力推广与应用。

Objective: In the patients with benign thyroid nodules as the research object, the low small incision surgery and traditional thyroid surgery are applied to compare the treatment effect of these two surgical approaches on patients. Methods: The study subjects were 98 patients with benign thyroid sarcoidosis, who were selected from Lijin County Yanwo Central Health Center between December 2018 and December 2020. According to the admission sequence, the patients were divided into two equal groups, with 49 cases in each group, namely the control group(conventional thyroid surgery) and the experimental group(low and small incision surgery). The treatment measures were compared between the two groups. Results: From five aspects of surgical indexes, treatment time, pain score, complication rate and treatment effective rate, the experimental group was relatively better than the control group, the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion: For benign thyroid sarcoidosis, the low and small incision surgery treatment can shorten the patient’s intubation and hospitalization time, relieve the patient’s pain, reduce the incidence of complications, and achieve a relatively high clinical treatment efficiency, which is more significant than the traditional thyroid surgery treatment. Therefore, it should be promoted and applied in clinical treatment.