期刊文献+

从奥巴马到拜登:美国政府对印度洋战略的继承与发展 被引量:4

From Obama to Biden: The Succession and Development of the U. S. Indian Ocean Strategy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从奥巴马政府到拜登政府,美国的印度洋战略实质经历了从“亚太再平衡”战略框架下到“印太战略”框架下的大调整。特朗普政府时期,“印太战略”的提出与发展使得美国的印度洋战略相比前任政府而言有了明显调整;而拜登政府的印度洋战略则基本沿袭了特朗普政府印度洋战略的内容,并在此基础上进行了一定发展。不论是特朗普政府对印度洋战略的“大调整”还是拜登政府的“微调整”,美国印度洋战略的继承和发展都与印度洋高度的地缘价值、维持美国主导下的印度洋地区秩序的需要、印太地区盟友和伙伴的支持和配合、美国国内外形势的变化等原因密不可分。美国印度洋战略的调整势必会对中国、印太局势、国际形势产生很大影响。 The U. S. Indian Ocean strategy has actually undergone a significantly major adjustment from the “Asia-Pacific Rebalancing Strategy”framework to the “Indo-Pacific Strategy”framework from the Obama administration to the Biden administration. Compared with previous administrations,the proposal and development of the “Indo-Pacific Strategy”during the Trump administration made the U. S. Indian Ocean strategy significantly adjusted,while the Indian Ocean strategy of the Biden administration basically followed the contents of the Trump administration and developed on this basis. Whether the “major adjustment”of the Trump administration or the “minor adjustment”of the Biden administration,the reasons why the U. S. inherits and adjusts its Indian Ocean strategy are inseparable from the high geographical value of the Indian Ocean,the need to maintain U. S.-led regional order of the Indian Ocean,the support and cooperation of allies and partners in the Indo-Pacific and the changes of the situation at home and abroad. The adjustment of the U. S. Indian Ocean strategy will inevitably have much impact on China,the Indian Ocean region,as well as the global situation.
作者 王璐 Wang Lu
出处 《印度洋经济体研究》 CSSCI 2022年第2期38-56,152,153,共21页 Indian Ocean Economic and Political Review
关键词 美国 印度洋战略 印太地区 同盟体系 中美竞争 U.S. Indian Ocean Strategy Indo-Pacific Region Alliance System Sino-U.S.Competition
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献20

  • 1G. John Ikenberry.American Hegemony and East Asian Order[J]. Australian Journal of International Affairs, vol. 58, No. 3, 2004.
  • 2The National Military Strategy of the United States of America 2011 [DB/OL]. http://www.jcs.mil//content/ files/2011-02/020811084800_2011_NMS_-_08_FEB_2011.pdf.
  • 3Barry R. Posen.Command of the Commons The Military Foundation of U.S. Hegemony[J].International Security, Vol.28, No.1 (summer 2003).
  • 4Gabriel M. Scheinmann and Raphael S. Cohen.The Myth of "Securing the Commons"[M].Washington Quarterly, Winter 2012.
  • 5Evan Feigenbaum.Asia Unbound: China's Rise and the Contested Commons[J].East Asia Forum, Council of Foreign Relations (August 13, 2010).
  • 6C. Raja Mohan.Rising India: Partner in Shaping the Global Commons[M]. Washington Quarterly, July 2010.
  • 7Shawn Brimley.Promoting Security in Common Domains[M].Washington Quarterly, July 2010.
  • 8Abraham Denmark.Managing the Global Commons[M]. Washington Quarterly, July 2010.
  • 9Yiwei Wang.Rethinking the South China Sea Issue: A Perspective of Sino-U.S. Relations[J].Pacific Focus, 2006 ( 1 ).
  • 10.坚定不移沿着中国特色社会主义道路前进 为全面建成小康社会而奋斗[N].人民日报.2012(002)

共引文献21

同被引文献119

引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部