中国—东盟区域投资争端中仲裁机制的完善路径

The Path to Improve the Arbitration Mechanism in China-ASEAN Regional Investment Disputes

我国与东盟就投资签订的相关条约时间较早,内容宽泛且与不同国家订立的双边投资协议差距较大,使得中国—东盟投资争端解决机制适用困难,特别是诉讼由于地方保护主义而无法发挥应有作用。仲裁作为替代性解决机制之一,在中国与东盟的投资争端解决中具有自主性、灵活性、中立性及高效性等优势,应当选择以仲裁为代表的替代性纠纷解决机制作为最佳的路径。但仲裁机制也存在法律机制“碎片化”并缺乏协商机制,仲裁机制适用范围窄及执行困难等问题。为此,本文提出了构建中国-东盟投资争端中仲裁机制等针对性的完善建议。

My country and ASEAN signed relevant treaties on investment earlier,with broad content and a large gap between bilateral investment agreements concluded with different countries,making it difficult to apply the China-ASEAN investment dispute settlement mechanism,especially litigation due to local protec⁃tionism.Play its due role.As one of the alternative settlement mechanisms,arbitration has the advantages of autonomy,flexibility,neutrality and efficiency in the settlement of investment disputes between China and ASEAN.Alternative dispute resolution mechanisms represented by arbitration should be chosen as the best path.However,the arbitration mechanism also has problems such as the“fragmentation”of the legal mecha⁃nism and the lack of a negotiation mechanism,the narrow scope of application of the arbitration mechanism,and difficulties in implementation.To this end,it puts forward specific and perfect suggestions for con⁃structing an arbitration mechanism in China-ASEAN investment disputes.