期刊文献+

公共服务设施对住宅租赁价格的影响 被引量:3

The Impact of Public Service Facilities on the Rental Prices of Housing Market
下载PDF
导出
摘要 改善公共服务设施的配置对发展租赁市场和实现租购同权具有重要意义。文章选取交通、教育、医疗、生活和景观五类设施,研究公共服务设施的可达性、集聚度和质量对杭州市住宅租赁价格的资本化效应。发现:“行与食”相关的设施作用最大,提高地铁的可达性、集聚度以及增加各种类的餐馆密度能促进溢价;相对普通公共服务设施,租金对优质资源更敏感,租户愿意为三甲医院、A类景观这类“高品质设施”承担更高的居住成本;租金对“学区房”不敏感,反映了教育权的公平性问题。 Improving the allocation of public service facilities play a crucial role in developing the leasing market and realizing the co-right of the rental and home-ownership housing market. The research studies the capitalization effect of the accessibility, agglomeration, and quality of five categories of public service facilities: transport, schools, hospitals, restaurants, and landscape on the residential rental price in Hangzhou City. Research findings:The facilities related to "basic necessities of transportation and food" played the most critical role. Increasing the accessibility and agglomeration of the subway and the density of different types of restaurants can promote the price premium. Compared with common public service facilities,rent is more sensitive to high-quality resources, and tenants are willing to shoulder higher living costs for "high-quality facilities" such as Class-3A hospitals, Class-A landscapes. The rent is not sensitive to the effect of "school district housing", which reflects the inequity of the right to education.
作者 屠帆 丁然
出处 《建筑与文化》 2022年第4期93-95,共3页 Architecture & Culture
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(项目编号:17BGL257)。
关键词 公共服务设施 租赁价格 空间滞后模型 杭州市 public service facilities rental prices spatial lag model Hangzhou City
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献106

  • 1郝前进,陈杰.到CBD距离、交通可达性与上海住宅价格的地理空间差异[J].世界经济文汇,2007(1):22-35. 被引量:48
  • 2薛薇.SPSS统计分析方法及应用[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2004..
  • 3谷一桢,徐治乙.轨道交通对房地产价值影响研究综述[J].城市问题,2007(12):45-50. 被引量:23
  • 4Bowes D R, Ihlanfeldt K R. Identifying the impacts of rail tran- sit stations on residential property values [J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 2001,50(1): 1-25.
  • 5Downes T A, Zabel J E. The impact of school characteristics on house prices: Chicago 1987-1991 [J]. Journal of Urban Eco- nomics, 2002,52( 1 ): 1-25.
  • 6Liisa T, Miettinen A. Property Prices and Urban Forest Ameni- ties[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2000,39(2):205-223.
  • 7Mansfielda C, Pattanayak S K, McDow W, et al. Shades of Green: Measuring the value of urban forests in the housing mar- ket [J]. Journal of Forest Economics, 2005,11(3): 177-199.
  • 8Fack G, Grenet J. When do better schools raise housing prices? Evidence from Paris public and private schools [J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2010,94(1-2):59-77.
  • 9Panduro T E, Veie K L. Classification and valuation of urban green spaces A hedonic house price valuation[J]. Land- scape and Urban Planning, 2013, 120:119-128.
  • 10Rosen S. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differen- tiation in pure competition [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1974,82(1):34-55.

共引文献192

同被引文献58

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部