摘要
部分网络仲裁的司法审查案件反映了当事人程序权利保障与争议解决效率的冲突。依据接近"数字正义"理论结合网络仲裁程序运行的规律,本研究发现网络仲裁程序体现了接近"数字正义"理论的特点并可以实现接近"数字正义",同时也存在违背"数字正义"的潜在风险。对此,网络仲裁程序的司法审查应结合接近"数字正义"的特点及潜在风险进行监管,合理划分仲裁审理模式的准入范围,并在此基础上设定对应的司法审查标准予以监督。同时,司法审查还需要关注该程序所衍生的数据保密及共享问题。
Some of the judicial review cases in terms of online arbitration reflect the conflict between the protection of the parties’ procedural rights and the efficiency of dispute resolution. The theory of access ’digital justice’ and the practices of online arbitration process reflect that online arbitration process meet the characteristics of ’digital justice’. The process can access ’digital justice’ but could also result in potential risks of ’digital justice’. Judicial review of online arbitration process should review process under the characteristics and potential risks of digital justice. In more detail,court should provide the access scope reasonably according to the different arbitration hearings, following by providing the specific standards of judicial review. At the same time, judicial review of online arbitration should also pay attention to the data protection and sharing issues.
作者
汪超
陈雪儿
Wang Chao;Chen Xueer
出处
《中国应用法学》
CSSCI
2022年第1期151-166,共16页
China Journal of Applied Jurisprudence
关键词
网络商事仲裁
司法审查
接近数字正义
online arbitration
judicial review
access digital justice