期刊文献+

进食障碍照料者技能量表中文版的效度和信度 被引量:1

Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Caregiver Skills Scale
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评估进食障碍照料者技能量表(CASK)中文版在神经性厌食和神经性贪食患者的照料者中应用的效度和信度。方法:选取符合DSM-5诊断标准的神经性厌食和神经性贪食患者的照料者151名,进行CASK测评;选取其中37名照料者进行照料者技能培训,比较培训前后CASK得分以检验实证效度。结果:探索性因子分析抽取大局观、自我照料、闭嘴、理解接纳、情商、挫折耐受6个因子;验证性因子分析显示6因子模型拟合良好(χ^(2)/df=2.47,CFI=0.84,TLI=0.82,RMSEA=0.09);照料者在参与照料技能培训后的CASK各维度得分及总分均高于培训前(均P<0.001)。总量表的Cronbachα系数为0.96,各维度的α系数为0.81~0.92;总量表的重测信度为0.85,各维度的重测信度为0.63~0.87。结论:进食障碍照料者技能量表中文版具有良好的效度和信度,可用于评估国内进食障碍患者照料者的照料技能水平。 Objective:To evaluate the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Caregiver Skills(CASK)scalein caregivers of anorexia and bulimia nervosa patients.Methods:A total of 151 caregivers of patients with anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa who met the diagnostic criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders,Fifth Edition(DSM-5)were selected for CASK evaluation.Among them,37 caregivers were selected for caregiver skills training,and their CASK scores before and after the training were compared to test the empirical validity.Result:Exploratory factor analysis extracted 6 factors,namely bigger picture,self-care,bitingyour-tongue,insight and acceptance,emotional intelligence and frustration tolerance.Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the 6-factor model was well fitted(χ^(2)/df=2.47,CFI=0.84,TLI=0.82,RMSEA=0.09).The scores of CASK dimensions and total scores of caregivers after attending the training were higher than those before the training(Ps<0.001).The Cronbach α coefficients were 0.96 for the total scale and 0.81-0.92 for each dimension.The retest reliabilities were 0.85 for the total scale and 0.63-0.87 for each dimension.Conclusion:The Chinese version of the caregiver coping skills scale has good validity and reliability,and could be used to evaluate the level of caregivers of eating disorders in China.
作者 安辰梓 韩煦 李雪霓 孔庆梅 耿淑霞 AN Chenzi;HAN Xu;LI Xueni;KONG Qingmei;GENG Shuxia(East China Normal University,Shanghai 200062,China;Beijng Haidian District Mental Health Prevention and Control Hospi-tal,Bejjig 100194,China;Peking University Sixth Hospital,Peking University Institute of Mental Health,NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health(Peking University),National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders(Peking University Sixth Hospital),Beijing 100083,China)
出处 《中国心理卫生杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2022年第5期417-422,共6页 Chinese Mental Health Journal
关键词 进食障碍 照料者 进食障碍照料者技能量表 效度 信度 eating disorder caregiver Caregiver Skills Scale validity reliability
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献16

  • 1肖世富,卜锦炎,严和駸,毕华.一般健康问卷的信度和效度研究[J].上海精神医学,1993,5(3):185-187. 被引量:39
  • 2Wynd CA,Schmidt B,Schaefer MA.Two quantitative approachesfor estimating content validity[J].Western J Nurs Res,2003,25(5):508–518.
  • 3Lindell MK,Brandt CJ,Whitney DJ.A revised index of interrateragreement for multi-item ratings of a single target[J].Appl PsycholMeasurem,1999,23(2):127–135.
  • 4Lawshe CH.A quantitative approach to content validity[J].Personne Psychol,1975,28(4):563–575.
  • 5Hambleton RK,Swaminathan H,Algina J,et al.Criterion-referencedtesting and measurement:Review of technical issues anddevelopments[J].Rev Educat Res,1978,48(1):11–22.
  • 6Martuza VR.Applying norm-referenced and criterion-referenced measurement in education[M].Boston:Allyn andBacon,1977:275–293.
  • 7Lynn MR.Determination and quantification of content validity[J].Nursing Res,1986,35(6):382–385.
  • 8Davis LL.Instrument review:Getting the most from your panel ofexperts[J].Appl Nurs Res,1992,5(4):194–197.
  • 9Polit DF,Beck CT.The content validity index:are you sure youknow what’s being reported?critique and recommendations[J].Res Nurs Health,2006,29(5):489–497.
  • 10Nora JJ.Causes old and new modes,mechanisms and models.Am Heart J,1993,125:1409

共引文献1037

同被引文献23

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部