期刊文献+

论明中叶唐顺之批选《史记》《汉书》 被引量:1

A Study on Tang Shunzhi′s Criticism of Historical Records and Hanshu in Mid-Ming Dynasty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在注重汉史研习的社会风尚影响下,在应对科举考试和深入参与明中叶的古文运动需求的推动下,唐顺之批选了《史记》《汉书》。唐顺之批选《史记》《汉书》的学术行为,既体现了其对《史记》《汉书》的认可和推崇,也在文字训诂、史事考实以及经世致用和“异端”史学思想方面表现出一些新的变化,从而成为明中后期相关史学思潮的有机组成部分。 Under the influence of the social customs that the rulers advocated emphasizing the study of Han history and the impetus of responding to the imperial examination and the need to deeply participate in the ancient prose movement in the middle of the Ming Dynasty, Tang Shunzhi criticized Historical Records and Hanshu. Tang Shunzhi′ s academic behavior in criticizing Historical Records and Hanshu not only reflected his recognition and admiration of Historical Records and Hanshu, but also in terms of textual exegesis, assessment of historical events, statecraft and heretical historical thinking showed some new changes, which has become s become an organic part of the relevant historical trends in the middle and late Ming Dynasty.
作者 李德锋 鞠星 LI De-feng;JU Xing(School of History and Travel Culture,Inner Mongolia University,Hohhot Inner Mongolia 010021,China)
出处 《廊坊师范学院学报(社会科学版)》 2022年第1期33-42,共10页 Journal of Langfang Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 唐顺之 批选 《史记》 《汉书》 Tang Shunzhi Criticism Historical Records Hanshu
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献57

  • 1钱茂体.论《藏书》对《左编》的继承与批判[J].福建论坛(文史哲版),1998(6):52-55. 被引量:2
  • 2陈启能.略论当代西方史学的观念变革[J].学习与探索,1996(1):127-134. 被引量:4
  • 3唐顺之.两汉解疑[M].光绪十一年(1885)山阴宋氏忏花盘刻本.
  • 4唐顺之.两晋解疑[M].丛书集成初编本.
  • 5唐顺之.两汉解疑[M].丛书集成初编本.
  • 6唐鼎元.荆川先生著述考[M].民国铅刻本.
  • 7唐鼎元.明唐荆川先生年谱[M].民国二十八年(1939)武进唐氏刻本.
  • 8傅维麟.明书[M].清康熙三十四年(1695)本诚堂本.
  • 9唐顺之.荆川先生文集[M].四部丛刊本.
  • 10唐顺之.历代史纂左编[M].明嘉靖四十年(1561)胡宗宪刻本.

共引文献11

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部