期刊文献+

产科急诊预检分诊标准的临床应用研究 被引量:2

Clinical application of obstetric emergency triage scale
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨产科急诊预检分诊标准的临床应用效果。方法选取2020年12月-2021年1月浙江省3所三级甲等妇产科医院的4286例产科急诊患者,对患者病情分级、去向、预检分诊目标响应时间进行统计分析,比较预检护士和专家组的分诊级别一致性。结果病情分级为Ⅰ级、Ⅱ级、Ⅲ级、Ⅳ级的产科急诊患者分别占总数的1.2%、16.5%、73.2%、9.0%,住院率分别为96.2%、76.6%、46.3%、0.5%,急诊预检分诊目标响应时间符合率分别为100%、96.8%、97.7%、100%,预检护士与专家组分诊级别一致性检验Kappa值为0.961[95%CI(0.950,0.970)]。结论产科急诊预检分诊标准有较好的敏感性、可操作性,并且与临床评定结果具有较好的一致性。 Objective To investigate the application effect of the obstetric emergency triage scale. Methods The data of 4 286 emergency obstetric patients from three tertiary class A obstetrics and gynecology hospitals in Zhejiang province from December 2020 to January 2021 were statistically analyzed,including disease classification,destination,triage target response time. We tested the consistency of triage levels rated by the nurses and expert group. Results The percentage of level Ⅰ,level Ⅱ,level Ⅲ,level Ⅳ among obstetric patients were 1.2%,16.5%,73.2% and 9.0% respectively. The hospitalization rate were 96.2%,76.6%,46.3% and 0.5%. The triage target response time were 100.0%,96.8%,97.7%,and 100% respectively. The consistency Kappa value between nurses and expert group was 0.961 [95%CI(0.950,0.970)]. Conclusion The obstetric emergency triage scale has high sensitivity and practicality,and has high consistency among clinical assesors.
作者 项珍珍 金静芬 冯素文 徐凌燕 曾婉婷 苏水红 XIANG Zhenzhen;JIN Jingfen;FENG Suwen;XU Lingyan;ZENG Wanting;SU Shuihong
出处 《中华急危重症护理杂志》 2022年第2期116-120,共5页 Chinese Journal of Emergency and Critical Care Nursing
基金 国家卫生健康委员会2018年标准修订计划项目(20181401) 浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(2020KY618)。
关键词 妇产科 医院 预检分诊 护理标准 急症护理 Obstetrics and Gynecology Department,Hospital Triage Standard of Care Emergency Care
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献34

  • 1金静芬.急诊预检分诊标准解读[J].中华急危重症护理杂志,2020,1(1):49-52. 被引量:31
  • 2无,金静芬,陈玉国,朱华栋,张茂,刘颖青,李葆华,黄素芳,甘秀妮,芦良花,陈水红,杨旻斐,沈小玲,楼秋英,王钰炜,郭芝廷.急诊预检分诊标准(成人部分)[J].中华急危重症护理杂志,2020,1(1):45-48. 被引量:36
  • 3石一复,周郁鹤.重视妇产科医疗安全妥善处理医疗纠纷[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2005,21(12):705-705. 被引量:84
  • 4孙红,绳宇,周文华.急诊分诊标准的制定与实施[J].护理学杂志,2007,22(13):58-60. 被引量:60
  • 5卫生部医管司.急诊患者病情分级试点指导原则(征求意见稿)[S].北京:中华人民共和国卫生部,2011:1-6.
  • 6朱旭艳,尤燕玲.浅谈妇产科医疗安全妥善处理医疗纠纷.医药与保健[J].2010,18(4):192.
  • 7Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians. Canadian Triage and AeuityScale (CTAS). [EB/OL] [2014-06-20]. http: // eaep. ca/resourees/etas.
  • 8Fernandes CM, MeLeod S, Kranse J, et al. Reliability of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale: interrater and intrarater agreement from a community and an academic emergency department [J]. CJEM, 2013, 15 (4): 227-233.
  • 9Howlett MK, Atkinson PR. A method for reviewing the accuracy and reliability of a five-level triage process (canadian triage and acuity scale ) in a community emergency department setting: building the crowding measurement infrastructure [ J ]. Emerg Med Int, 2012: 636045.
  • 10张杰.中法急诊预检分诊制度对比及借鉴[J].护理学报,2009,16(17):20-22. 被引量:43

共引文献303

同被引文献23

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部