期刊文献+

老年住院患者步速和握力对全因死亡预测价值的比较 被引量:6

Comparison of gait speed and grip strength for the prediction of all-cause mortality in elderly inpatients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析75岁及以上老年住院患者步速和握力与出院后死亡的关系,并比较两者对全因死亡的预测价值.方法采用前瞻性队列研究,入选2016年12月至2019年12月在首都医科大学附属复兴医院全科及老年医学科住院且年龄≥75岁的老年患者,采用6 m步行试验和握力计测量步速(m/s)和握力(kg),出院随访1年以上并记录患者的全因死亡时间,采用Cox回归模型分析步速、握力和步速联合握力与全因死亡风险的相关性.步速与握力的ROC曲线采用DeLong检验进行统计学比较.结果共入选患者704例,年龄(83.8±6.3)岁;中位随访时间33(24,42)月,随访期间共131例(18.6%)发生全因死亡.与步速未减慢及握力未下降组比较,步速减慢及握力下降组的全因死亡发生率更高(均P<0.05).采用Cox回归模型对步速和握力与全因死亡的关系进行分析,结果显示,在校正了相关因素后,步速(HR=2.255,95%CI:1.462~3.477,P<0.001)和握力(HR=1.815,95%CI:1.232~2.673,P<0.001)均与全因死亡风险相关,且与步速未减慢合并握力未下降组比较,当步速减慢同时握力下降时死亡风险最大(HR=3.156,95%CI:1.829~5.445,P<0.001).采用Delong检验对步速及握力的ROC曲线进行比较,结果显示,步速的曲线下面积(AUC)(0.703,95%CI:0.667~0.736)大于握力的AUC(0.648,95%CI:0.611~0.683),面积间差异为0.055(95%CI:0.006~0.103,P=0.026).结论步速减慢或握力下降均与死亡风险增加有关,当患者同时存在步速减慢和握力下降时,死亡风险最高;步速对死亡的预测价值优于握力,两者可以作为简便、快捷、有效的预测老年人群全因死亡的工具. Objective To analyze the relationship between gait speed or grip strength and all-cause mortality in elderly inpatients over 75 years old,and to compare their predictive value for all-cause mortality.Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted and enrolled elderly patientsaged≥75 years hospitalized from December 2016 to December 2019 at the Department of IntegratedMedicine and Geriatries,Fuxing Hospital,Capital Medical University.Gait speed(m/s)and grip strength(kg)were respectively measured via the 6-meter walk test and a dynamometer.The patients were followed up for more than 1 year after discharge,and the time of all-cause mortality was recorded.The Cox regression model was used to analyze the correlation between gait speed,grip strength or their combination and the risk of all-cause mortality.ROC curves were statistically analyzed using the DeLong test.Results A total of 704 patients were enrolled,with an average age of(83.8±6.3)years;the median follow-up time was 33(24,42)months.During the follow-up period,all-cause death occurred in 131 cases(18.6%).Compared with the high gait speed and high grip strength groups,the low gait speed and low grip strength groups had higher all-cause mortality(all P<0.05).The Cox regression model was used to analyze the relationships between gait speed,grip strength and all-cause mortality.The results showed that gait speed(HR=2.255,95%CI:1.462-3.477,P<0.001)and grip strength(HR=1.815,95%CI:1.232-2.673.P<0.001)were associated with the risk of all-cause mortality after adjustment for other factors:When gait speed slowed down and grip strength decreased,the risk of death reached the highest level(HR=3.156,95%C1:1.829-5.445.P<0,001).The AUC of the gait speed model(0.703,95%CI:0.667-0.736)was higher than the AUC of the grip strength model(0.648.95%CI:0.611-0.683).with a difference of 0.055(95%.CI:0.006-0.103,P=0.026).Conclusions Decreased gait speed or grip strength is related to an increase of death risk.The risk of death is highest when the patient has both slowed gait speed and decreased grip strength.The predictive value of gait speed for death is better than grip strength.Together they can be used as simple,rapid and effective tools to predict all-cause mortality in this population.
作者 吴薇 王青 王鹏 符琳琳 路菲 翟雪靓 Wu Wei;Wang Qing;Wang Peng;Fu Linlin;Lu Fei;Zhai Xueliang(General Practice Ward»Fusing Hospital of Capital Medical University,Beijing 100038,China;Department of Integrated Medicine I Geriatrics Fusing Hospital of Capital Medical University»Beijing 100038,China;Department of Integrated Geriatrics,Peking Union Medical College Hospital,Beijing 100005 China)
出处 《中华老年医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2022年第4期401-405,共5页 Chinese Journal of Geriatrics
关键词 住院病人 步速 握力 死亡率 Inpatients Gait speed Hand strength Mortality
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献60

  • 1周峰,宋桂香,许慧慧.疾病共存研究[J].上海预防医学,2004,16(11):535-536. 被引量:2
  • 2Feinstein AR.The pre-therapeutic classification of co-morbidity in chronic disease[J].J Chron Dis, 1970, 23(7):455-469.
  • 3Kessler RC, Avenevoli S, McLaughlin KA, et al.Lifetime comorbidity of DSM-IV disorders in the NCS-R Adolescent Supplement(NCS-A)[J].Psychological Medicine, 2012, 42(9):1997-2010.
  • 4Meghani SH, Buck HG, Dickson VV, et al.The conceptualization and measurement of comorbidity:a review of the interprofessional discourse[J].Nursing Research and Practice, 2013, 2013:192782-192782.
  • 5Fillenbaum GG, Pieper CF, Cohen HJ, et al.Comorbidity of five chronic health conditions in elderly community residents:determinants and impact on mortality[J].J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 2000, 55(2):M84-89.
  • 6van Spronsen DJ, Janssen-Heijnen ML, Lemmens VE, et al.Independent prognostic effect of co-morbidity in lymphoma patients:results of the population-based Eindhoven Cancer Registry[J].Eur J Cancer, 2005, 41(7):1051-1057.
  • 7Frenkel WJ, Jongerius EJ, Mandjes-van Uitert MJ, et al.Validation of the Charlson Comorbidity Index in acutely hospitalized elderly adults:a prospective cohort study[J].J Am Geriatr Soc, 2014, 62(2):342-346.
  • 8Robbins JR, Gayar OH, Zaki M, et al.Impact of age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity score on outcomes for patients with early-stage endometrial cancer[J].Gynecologic Oncology, 2013, 131(3):593-597.
  • 9Huang YQ, Gou R, Diao YS, et al.Charlson comorbidity index helps predict the risk of mortality for patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy[J].Journal of Zhejiang University-Science B, 2014, 15(1):58-59.
  • 10Yang Y, Yang KS, Hsann YM, et al.The effect of comorbidity and age on hospital mortality and length of stay in patients with sepsis[J].J Crit Care, 2010, 25(3):398-405.

共引文献220

同被引文献74

引证文献6

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部