期刊文献+

预测加工:走出两代认知科学的历史僵局 被引量:2

Predictive Processing:Breaking the Impasse of Two Generations of Cognitive Science
下载PDF
导出
摘要 表征-计算观与具身行动观对认知的本质几乎做了截然相反的强调。近年来,预测加工理论的发展为统一两代认知科学提供了契机。预测加工是层级预测加工与主动预测加工这两大理论部件的合称,前一部件主要继承了第一代认知科学中的层级计算加工进路,后一部件则发扬了第二代认知科学中与行动有关的理论,这两大理论部件被视为同一个统一整合理论的两个不同方面。在当代,预测加工被认为有望成为未来认知科学的新范式。 Nowadays,quarrels and fights between two generations of cognitive science almost result in an inevitable impasse.For instance,a deep theoretical relation between J.J.Gibson and David Marr have been carved off,and of which two theories each other have been pushed toward the opposite side;which could be viewed as a portrayal of these overt states of affairs.The central tenet of the First-Generation Cognitive Science summarizes as:The Representational-Computational Approach;and the central tenet of the Second-Generation Cognitive Science:The Embodied Action Approach.What is the nature of“mind”at all?These two approaches conflict each other;and the either/or choice seems the only game in the town.In recent years,researchers attempt to integrate both strains of sources,hoping to provide a unified framework,thus of which could be viewed as prospectively breaking the impasse of two generations of cognitive science in the near future.It is called“Predictive Processing”.This approach apparently originates in hierarchal predictive coding of visual and auditory studies(since 1980 s),and thereby has been modified substantively by the neuroscientist Karl Friston,et al.,into a mode of action-oriented.Predictive Processing combines with two indispensable components:Hierarchical Predictive Processing and Active Predictive Processing.In rough,the Hierarchical Predictive Processing mainly inherits from hierarchical predictive coding theories of the First-Generation Cognitive Science(e.g.,Marr’s multi-level computational theory of vision,hierarchical neural networks,etc.);and the Active Predictive Processing somehow advocates various versions of theories of the Second-Generation Cognitive Science related with action(e.g.,Gibson’s affordances theory,enactive cognition,etc.).Both components could be viewed as dual aspect of a single unified theory.In Predictive Processing,the Free Energy Principle views adaptivity as the fundamental principle of the theory construction of neural and cognitive systems,and until self-organizing adaptive systems.The overall aim of Hierarchical Predictive Processing is to make the cognitive agency adaptable and sustainable as much as possible.Next,the optimization problem of adaptation turns into problems of surprising minimization or“prediction errors minimization”by means of Bayesian inference and Bayesian statistics.The basic working mechanism of Hierarchical Predictive Processing is the ascending prediction-descending prediction errors tradeoffs.The so-called“Active Inference”is the complementary component of Free Energy Principle,which is seen by Paul Cisek et al.,is confirmed with multiple affordances competition mechanism.The Active Predictive Processing shows perception-action tradeoffs,or“epistemic-pragmatic tradeoffs”.Both perception(epistemic value)and action(pragmatic value)ultimately serve for adaptivity(adaptive value).Perception-action cycle of Predictive Processing could be regarded as a second-order cycle based on first-order embodied reflex arc(in Deweyan sense);which could also be seen as an internalized closed loop within the corporal brain.Thus on the nature of cognition,contrasting with past two generations of cognitive science,Predictive Processing has made revolutionary breakthrough.Cognition as the systematic function of general adaptive system complies with the fundamental adaptivity principle.The conventional object-invariants analysis beneath paradigms of two generations of cognitive science,thus ought to give way to mind-world adaptivity analysis underlying the Predictive Processing paradigm.Philosophically speaking,Predictive Processing seems to be consistent with a process theory.In the end,on the basis of the currents and trends of Predictive Processing,we attempt to propose an integrated view.In our view,the pressing contemporary task of Predictive Processing is trying to integrate two generations of cognitive science-Representational-Computational Approach and Embodied Action Approach.
作者 董达 陈巍 Dong Da;Chen Wei(Center for Brain,Mind and Education,Shaoxing University,Shaoxing,312000;Department of Philosophy,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou,310007;Center for the Study of Language and Cognition,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou,310007)
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2022年第1期235-241,共7页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 国家社科基金青年项目(20CZX015) 浙江省哲学社会科学规划新兴交叉学科重大扶持项目(21XXJC05ZD) 中国博士后科学基金特别资助(2019T120530)和中国博士后科学基金面上资助(2019M652134)的资助。
关键词 预测加工 层级预测编码 自由能原理 主动推断 predictive processing hierarchical predictive coding free energy principle active inference
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献55

  • 1刘晓力.交互隐喻与涉身哲学——认知科学新进路的哲学基础[J].哲学研究,2005(10):73-80. 被引量:50
  • 2索罗斯.《金融炼金术》[M].海南出版社,1999..
  • 3梅洛-庞蒂.《知觉现象学》[M].商务印书馆,2001年.第531页、第520页、第521-522页、第521页、第100页、第101页、第101页、第530页、第102页、第105页、第164页、第164页注释1、第164页、第183-184页注释3、第185页、第186页、第175页、第204页、第196页、第216页、第.
  • 4胡塞尔.《欧洲科学的危机与超越论的现象学》[M].商务印书馆,2001年..
  • 5A. Newell & H. Simon, Computer Science as Empirical Enquiry: Symbols and Search. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, vol. 19, 1976, pp. 113-126.
  • 6F. J. Varela,E. Thompson & E. Roseh, The Embodied Mind : Cognitive Science and Human Experience.Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press, 1991. p. 134.
  • 7R.A. Brooks, Intelligence without Representation. Artificial Intelligence, vol. 47, 1991, pp. 139-159.
  • 8T. van Gelder, The Dynamical Hypothesis in Cognitive Science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 21,1998, pp. 615-665.
  • 9A. Clark, The Dynamical Challenge. Cognitive Science, vol. 21, no. 4, 1997, pp. 461-481.
  • 10G. Lakoff&M. Johnson, Philosophy in the Flesh : The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought, New York: Basic Books, 1999, p. 1.

共引文献55

同被引文献66

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部