期刊文献+

盐酸羟考酮缓释片在糖尿病性神经痛中的疗效及对VAS评分的影响 被引量:2

Efficacy of oxycodone hydrochloride controlled-release tablets in diabetic neuralgia and its effect on VAS score
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨盐酸羟考酮缓释片(奥施康定)在糖尿病性神经痛(PDN)中的疗效及对VAS评分的影响。方法选取黑龙江省佳木斯市肿瘤医院2018年8月至2020年8月确诊并治疗的66例PDN患者,对所有PDN患者的诊疗资料进行回顾性分析;依据不同用药分组,对照组使用加巴喷丁,研究组使用奥施康定。比较两组干预前、干预后不同时间节点下的疼痛视觉模拟(VAS)评分变化、两组的有效性及不良反应发生率。结果研究组干预后各个时间节点下的VAS评分均低于对照组(P<0.05)。研究组的有效性高于对照组(P<0.05)。两组的不良反应情况比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论给予PDN患者盐酸羟考酮缓释片治疗,可获得更为显著的治疗有效性,降低PDN患者的VAS评分。 Objective To investigate the efficacy of oxycodone hydrochloride controlled-release tablets(OxyContin)in painful diabetic neuropathy(PDN)and its effect on VAS score.Methods A total of 66 PDN patients diagnosed and treated in Jiamusi Cancer Hospital in Heilongjiang Province from August 2018 to August 2020 were selected.The diagnosis and treatment data of all PDN patients were retrospectively analyzed.They were grouped according to different medications.The control group were given gabapentin,and the study group were given OxyContin.The changes in the visual analog scales(VAS)score at different time nodes before and after the intervention,effectiveness and incidence of adverse events were observed and compared between the two groups.Results The VAS scores in the study group at each time node after intervention were lower than those in the control group(P<0.05).The effectiveness in the study group was higher than that in the control group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in incidence of adverse events between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion The treatment of PDN patients with oxycodone hydrochloride controlled-release tablets(OxyContin)can obtain more significant therapeutic effectiveness and reduce VAS score of PDN patients.
作者 姜文婷 俞岩 JIANG Wenting;YU Yan(Department of Pharmacy,Jiamusi Cancer Hospital in Heilongjiang Province,Jiamusi154000,China)
出处 《中国现代医生》 2022年第7期106-108,共3页 China Modern Doctor
关键词 盐酸羟考酮缓释片 奥施康定 糖尿病性神经痛 疗效 VAS评分 Oxycodone hydrochloride controlled-release tablets OxyContin Diabetic neuralgia Efficacy VAS score
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献109

  • 1郭环宇,王玲玲,景年财.以奥施康定为初始滴定治疗中、重度癌痛的疗效[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(12):3285-3286. 被引量:33
  • 2王乐三,孙振球,蔡太生,周智广.2型糖尿病患者生活质量量表的研制与考评[J].中南大学学报(医学版),2005,30(1):21-27. 被引量:110
  • 3Woodforde JM,Merskey H. Some relationships between subjective measures of pain[J].{H}Journal of Psychosomatic Research,1972,(03):173-178.
  • 4Jensen MP,Chen C,Brugger AM. Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores:a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain[J].{H}Journal of Pain,2003,(07):407-414.
  • 5Gallagher E J,Liebman M,Bijur PE. Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale[J].{H}Annals of Emergency Medicine,2001,(06):633-638.
  • 6Gallagher E J,Bijur PE,Latimer C. Reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for acute abdominal pain in the ED[J].{H}American Journal of Emergency Medicine,2002,(04):287-290.
  • 7Fosnocht DE,Chapman CR,Swanson ER. Correlation of change in visual analog scale with pain relief in the ED[J].{H}American Journal of Emergency Medicine,2005,(01):55-59.
  • 8Grilo RM,Treves R,Preux PM. Clinically relevant VAS pain score change in patients with acute rheumatic conditions[J].{H}Joint Bone Spine:Revue du Rhumatisme,2007,(04):358-361.
  • 9Bird SB,Dickson EW. Clinically significant changes in pain along the visual analog scale[J].{H}Annals of Emergency Medicine,2001,(06):639-643.
  • 10Kelly AM. The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain[J].{H}EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL,2001,(03):205-207.

共引文献6119

同被引文献29

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部