期刊文献+

Surface structure change properties:Auto-soft bionic fibrous membrane in reducing postoperative adhesion 被引量:2

原文传递
导出
摘要 Peritoneal adhesion is the most common adverse effect following abdominal surgery or inflammation.The occurrence in clinical trials has been successfully reduced using barriers.However,the shortcomings of frequently used adhesion barriers,such as rapid degradation rate of gel barrier and inadequate operation ability of solid barrier,cannot be ignored.In this study,a fibrous membrane with an ECM-like structure was prepared.The adhesion properties were reduced significantly by changing the surface structure.The fibrous membrane caused less inflammatory response and much less peripheral adhesion and intestinal obstruction compared to the casting film and the commercial film with smooth surface,though with the same components.Because of the auto-soft bionic structure and similarity in the mechanical modulus of the tissues,the fibrous membrane was more flexible when it adhered to the tissues,showed excellent effectiveness and biocompatibility.In addition to the rat and miniature pig models,a randomized,placebo-controlled,and multicenter clinical pilot study with 150 patients confirmed that because of its flexibility,biodegradability,and similarity to mechanical modulus and structure with tissues involved,the fibrous membrane served as a favorable implant for preventing post-operation adhesion.
出处 《Bioactive Materials》 SCIE 2022年第6期16-29,共14页 生物活性材料(英文)
基金 financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(31971318,32071332,21876205) the Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province(2020B0101020001) the Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Project(JCYJ20170818101220860) Chinese Academy of Sciences Key Laboratory of Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanosafety(NSKF202015,NSKF202016) the Shenzhen High-end Talent Project(KQRC2017-000244) TransEasy Medical Tech.Co.,Ltd.(HX201910082).
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献97

  • 1Parker MC. Epidemiology of adhesions: the burden. Hosp Med 2004; 65:330-336.
  • 2Boland GM, Weigel RJ. Formation and prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions. J Surg Res 2006; 132:3-12.
  • 3Schniiriger B, Barmparas G, Branco BC, Lustenberger T, Inaba K, Demetriades D. Prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesions: a review of the literature. Am J Surg 2011; 201:111-121.
  • 4Diamond MP, Freeman ML. Clinical implications of postsurgical adhesions. Hum Reprod Update 2001; 7:567-576.
  • 5Ellis H. The clinical significance of adhesions: focus on intestinal obstruction. Eur J Surg Supp11997; (577): 5-9.
  • 6Pouly JL, Seak-San S. Adhesions: laparoscopy versus laparotomy. In: DiZerega GS, editor. Peritoneal surgery. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2000:183-192.
  • 7Diamond MP. Reduction of de novo postsurgical adhesions by intraoperative precoating with Sepracoat (HAL-C) solution: a prospective, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled multicenter study. The Sepracoat Adhesion Study Group. Fertil Steri11998; 69:1067-1074.
  • 8Kossi J, Salminen P, Rantala A, Laato M. Population-based study of the surgical workload and economic impact of bowel obstruction caused by postoperative adhesions. Br J Surg 2003; 90:1441-1444.
  • 9Menzies D, Ellis H. Intestinal obstruction from adhesions-- how big is the problem? Ann R Coll Surg Engl1990; 72:60-63.
  • 10Ergul E, Korukluoglu B. Peritoneal adhesions: facing the enemy. Int J Surg 2008; 6:253-260.

共引文献46

同被引文献5

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部