期刊文献+

高中数学教科书中数学史内容的比较研究——以人教A版(2019版)和北师大版(2019版)为例 被引量:3

A comparative study on the history of mathematics in high school mathematics textbooks:based on the version A published by People's Education Press(2019)and that by Beijing Normal University Press(2019)for example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 新一轮的数学课程改革强调数学文化在教科书中的作用,数学史作为数学文化不可或缺的元素,被关注的热度持续升温.通过对人教A版、北师大版高中新版教科书中融入数学史的比较和分析,发现两者在数学史主题分布上整体保持一致,同时有各自特色;在融入方式上较为稳定且体现改革理念.教师在关注数学史融入不同教科书的基础上,提高自身数学史素养,注重数学史理论学习与实践教学相结合,发挥教科书辅助资料的补充作用,有利于更好地回应数学课程改革. The new round of mathematics curriculum reform values the role of mathematics culture in textbooks.The history of mathematics,as an indispensable element of mathematics culture,is gaining ever-increasing attention.Through the comparison and analysis of the integration of the history of mathematics in the edition of People's Education Press and the new edition of Beijing Normal University Press high school textbooks,it is found that they are consistent in terms of the overall distribution of the themes of the history of mathematics while at the same time maintain characteristics of their own,and they are stable in the way of integration and a good reflection of the idea of reform.On the basis of adequate attention given to the incorporation of the history of mathematics into different textbooks,teachers should improve their own knowledge of the history of mathematics,paying attention to the combination of theoretical learning and practical teaching of the history of mathematics,and bring into play the supplementary role of the auxiliary materials of textbooks to better respond to the reform of mathematics curriculum.
作者 刘金海 代钦 LIU Jinhai;DAI Qin(Institute for the History of Science and Technology,Inner Mongolia Normal University,Hohhot,Inner Mongolia 010022,China)
出处 《内江师范学院学报》 CAS 2022年第4期1-6,共6页 Journal of Neijiang Normal University
关键词 高中数学 教科书 数学史 比较研究 high school mathematics textbook history of mathematics comparative research
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献55

  • 1章建跃.普通高中数学课程标准教材的研究与编写[J].课程.教材.教法,2005,25(1):45-50. 被引量:22
  • 2李红婷.课改新视域:数学史走进新课程[J].课程.教材.教法,2005,25(9):51-54. 被引量:31
  • 3陈翠花,邵丁.对黄金分割及其教育意义的思考[J].数学教育学报,2006,15(4):21-23. 被引量:9
  • 4弗赖登塔尔.数学教育再探-在中国的讲学[M].刘意竹,杨刚译.上海:上海教育出版社,1999.
  • 5李大潜.将数学建模思想融人数学类主干课程[C]//大学数学课程报告论坛组委会.大学数学课程报告论坛论文集2005.北京:高等教育出版社,2006:15-19.
  • 6Siceloff,LP.,Wentworth ,G.,Smith,D.E.Analytical Geometry[M].Boston:Ginn & Company , 1922 : 287-288.
  • 7Wentworth,G.,Smith D.E.Solid Geometry[M].Boston : Ginn & Company,1913:453-457.
  • 8Tzanakis,C.,Arcavi,A.Integrating history of mathematics in the classroom:An analytic survey [ A ] .In J.Fauvel &J.van Maanen ( Eds ) .History in Mathematics Education.Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers , 2000 : 201-240.
  • 9Jankvist,U.T.A categorization of the“whys”and“hows”of using history in mathematics education [ J ] .Educational Studies in Mathematics , 2009 , 71 : 235-261.
  • 10Ancel-Lepesqueur ,C.et al.Math (3e-6e)[M] .Paris:Belin , 2007.

共引文献174

同被引文献15

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部