期刊文献+

我们真的了解学习毅力吗?:基于扎根理论刻画教师视角的可塑模型研究 被引量:8

Shall We Really Know about Perseverance? A Malleable Model from the Viewing of Teachers’ Based on Grounded Theory
原文传递
导出
摘要 学习毅力一直以来被认为是影响学业表现提升和学习能力发展的重要非认知因素。学习者如何能克服困难和挫折,并长期坚持完成学习任务,这其中学习者的性格特征和行为又发挥了何种作用?如何能在技术媒体日益丰富的学习环境中不被外界打扰、保持专注力,专心完成学习任务?问题背后的发生机理也正受到研究者的重视,即如何真正了解什么是学习毅力。因此,本研究力图以现有学习毅力的相关理论、发生机制和已有模型为基础展开探索。首先,梳理不同学习场景及相关实证研究,进而选择依托交互决定论和中介变量理论,来比较现有学习毅力模型和非认知能力模型;其次,采用扎根理论对来自不同专业领域的23位一线教师的访谈文本内容进行质性分析,访谈主要是对学习毅力的理解、内涵和影响因素等问题的深度探讨;最后,结合理论基础和访谈分析结果,刻画学习毅力的可塑模型。研究发现,对学习毅力及其影响因素的理解和测量方法的归纳,可以从四个方面来综合分析,即学习者个体特征、语境特征、关系特征和学习环境特征。从“四特征”内涵入手刻画的模型相对全面地构建了学习者画像,为解决学习动力不足、培养和发展学习毅力提供了理论指导和实践借鉴。 Learning perseverance has always been regarded as an important non-cognitive factor that affects the improvement of academic performance and the development of learning ability. However, how can learners overcome difficulties and frustrations and persist in completing learning tasks for a long time? What role do learners’ character traits and behaviors play? How can learners stay focused and complete learning tasks without being disturbed by the outside world in the increasingly technology-rich learning environment? The mechanism behind the problem is also being valued by researchers, that is, how to truly understand what learning perseverance is. Therefore, this research attempts to explore the mechanism based on the existing relevant theories, and existing models of learning perseverance. Firstly, we sorted out different learning scenarios and related empirical research, and then chose to rely on the interaction determinism and the mediating variable theory to compare the existing learning perseverance model and the non-cognitive ability model. Secondly, we used the grounded theory to compare 23 first-line teachers from different disciplines. The teacher’s interviews were qualitatively analyzed. The interview was mainly an in-depth discussion of the understanding, connotation and influencing factors of learning perseverance. Finally, combining theoretical foundation and interview analysis results, we portrayed a plastic model of learning perseverance. The study found that the understanding of learning perseverance and its influencing factors and the induction of measurement methods can be comprehensively analyzed from four aspects, namely, learner’s individual characteristics, context characteristics, relationship characteristics, and learning environment characteristics. The model described from the connotation of the “four characteristics” constructs a relatively comprehensive portrait of learners, and provides theoretical guidance and practical reference for solving the lack of learning motivation and cultivating learning perseverance.
作者 刘妍 管秀 顾小清 LIU Yan;GUAN Xiu;GU Xiaoqing(Department of Educational Information Technology,East China Normal University,Shanghai,200062,China;School of Education,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai,200240,China;Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Digital Education Equipment,Shanghai,200062,China)
出处 《全球教育展望》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第2期39-58,共20页 Global Education
基金 国家社会科学基金“十三五”规划2020年度教育学青年课题“指向非认知能力的学习困难诊断及其多模态数据反馈研究”(项目编号:CCA200254)。
关键词 学会学习 非认知因素 学习毅力 学习者画像 扎根理论 how to learn non-cognitive skills learning perseverance learner profile grounded theory
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献59

  • 1汤丹丹,温忠麟.共同方法偏差检验:问题与建议[J].心理科学,2020,43(1):215-223. 被引量:518
  • 2刘小先,龚少英,周治金,封晓伟,于全磊.父母自主支持、心理控制与初中生创意自我效能的关系:学业情绪的中介作用[J].心理发展与教育,2020,0(1):45-53. 被引量:13
  • 3俞国良,董妍.学业情绪研究及其对学生发展的意义[J].教育研究,2005,26(10):39-43. 被引量:292
  • 4董妍,俞国良.青少年学业情绪问卷的编制及应用[J].心理学报,2007,39(5):852-860. 被引量:355
  • 5朱丽芳.(2005). 大学生学业自我概念、成就目标定向与学习坚持性的关系研究. 硕士, 湖南师范大学.
  • 6Ainley, M., Corrigan, M., & Richardson, N.(2005). Students, tasks and emotions: Identifying the contribution of emotions to students′ reading of popular culture and popular science texts. Learning and Instruction, 15(5), 433-447.
  • 7Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A.(2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin, 134(6), 779-806.
  • 8Brockner, J., & Higgins, E. T.(2001). Regulatory focus theory: Implications for the study of emotions at work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(1), 35-66.
  • 9Brown, S. D., Tramayne, S., Hoxha, D., Telander, K., Fan, X., & Lent, R. W.(2008). Social cognitive predictors of college students′ academic performance and persistence: A meta-analytic path analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72(3), 298-308.
  • 10Dholakia, U. M., Gopinath, M., Bagozzi, R. P., & Nataraajan, R.(2006). The Role of Regulatory Focus in the Experience and Self-Control of Desire for Temptations. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(2), 163-175.

共引文献77

同被引文献136

引证文献8

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部