裁判文书说理如何对待司法政策?

How Does the Reasoning of Judicial Documents Deal with the Judicial Policy?

在司法裁判及其说理过程中,“政策不当适用”甚或架空法律规范的现象比较明显。从裁判说理的视角观察,该类现象大致存在以政策之名的“机械式”说理、挟政策之势的“运动式”说理以及借政策之力的“指标式”说理等情形。事实上,由于司法政策的宏观抽象性特征,在裁判及其文书说理过程中,其只能作为“向导”而非“先导”甚或“主导”,不宜将其直接作为裁判说理的根据。我们既要承认司法政策指引裁判方向和裁判说理的价值,又要警惕司法政策的泛滥和偏执。

In judicial practice, the phenomenon of "improper application of policy" is more obvious. From the perspective of referee reasoning, the "mechanical" reasoning in the name of policy, the "movement" reasoning relying on the trend of policy and the "quota" reasoning relying on the power of policy are more common. In fact, due to the macro abstract characteristics of policy, in the process of criminal judgment and its document reasoning, it can only be used as the "guide" rather than "leading" of judicial judgment, and can not be directly used as the basis of judgment or reasoning. We should not only recognize the value of policy guidance and judicial reasoning, but also guard against policy led "judicial stubbornness".