期刊文献+

“龙朔变体”说内涵考辨

Study On the Connotation of "the New Literary Style of Longshuo Period"
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对杨炯提出的“龙朔变体”一说,学界的解释众说纷纭。本文结合其产生语境对诸家观点逐一辨析,认为杨炯所批评的是贞观末至龙朔时期的讲究声律、对仗和堆砌辞藻的创作风气。这种风气的代表,虽然有以上官仪为代表的“上官体”,但更多的是以许敬宗为代表的“颂体诗”。“上官体”和“颂体诗”虽然有相像之处,但两者有本质区别。 There are different opinions on the explanation of"the New Literary Style of Longshu Period"put forward by YangJiong.This paper analyzes and differentiates the viewpoints one by one according to the context in which they are produced.It believed that what YangJiong criticizes is the stress on tone and antithesis in the period from the end of ZhenGuan to Longshuo.Although there is"Shangguanstyle"represented by ShangguanYi,there are more"Ode style poems"represented by XuJingzong.There are some similarities between"Shangguan style"and"Ode style poems",but they are fundamentally different.
作者 甘生统 GAN Sheng-tong(School of Literature,Hainan Normal University,Haikou 571158,China)
出处 《青海师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 2021年第6期81-86,共6页 Journal of Qinghai Normal University(Social Sciences)
基金 国家社科基金项目“隋唐五代类书与文学理论批评之研究”(16BZW054)。
关键词 龙朔变体 上官体 颂体诗 "the New Literary Style of Longshu Period" "Shangguan Style" "Ode style poems"
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献4

  • 1罗宗强等.隋唐五代文学史[M]高等教育出版社,1993.
  • 2(汉)许慎 撰,(清)段玉裁 注.说文解字注[M]. 上海古籍出版社, 1981
  • 3[日]弘法大师 原巽,王利器 校注.文镜秘府论校注[M]. 中国社会科学出版社, 1983
  • 4(唐)杨炯撰.盈川集[M]. 上海古籍出版社, 1992

共引文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部