期刊文献+

存在非正规回收企业竞争的厂商自主以旧换新策略分析 被引量:1

Autonomous old-for-new strategy of firms faced with competition with informal recycling enterprises
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为研究存在非正规回收企业竞争的情形下厂商自主以旧换新策略的影响,构建了博弈模型比较厂商自主以旧换新策略实施前后厂商与非正规回收企业的回收市场份额、回收价格以及利润的变化.研究表明:无以旧换新模式下,由于非正规回收企业在旧产品回收处理成本上占有优势,使得厂商在与非正规回收企业的竞争中通常处于劣势地位;厂商自主以旧换新模式下,厂商提供的旧产品抵消价格及其占有的旧产品回收市场份额不仅随着厂商处理单位旧产品获得的收益增大而提升,更是随着其整体新产品正向销售和旧产品逆向回收的总边际利润增大而提升;厂商自主以旧换新策略的实施可以提升厂商在与非正规回收企业竞争中的优势,使厂商获得更大的旧产品回收市场份额与利润,推动厂商新产品的销售和旧产品的回收. By establishing game-theoretic models,this paper investigates the impacts of autonomous old-fornew strategy of firms faced with competition with informal recycling enterprises,through comparing their shares of recycling market,recycling prices and profit changes before and after the implementation of the autonomous old-for-new strategy.The results show that,without the autonomous old-for-new strategy,the firms are always at a disadvantageous position in their competition with informal recycling enterprises because the latter greatly benefits from low recycling cost of old products.With the implementation of autonomous old-for-new strategy,the recycling prices and shares of recycling market of the firms not only increase with the earnings of processing a unit old product,but also increase with the total profit margin of sales of new products and recycling of old products.The implementation of autonomous old-for-new strategy can enhance the competitiveness of the firms in their competition with informal recycling enterprises,increase their market shares and profits in the old product recycling market,and promote their sales of new products and their recycling of old products.
作者 石平 石松 Shi Ping;Shi Song(School of Management,Guangdong University of Technology,Guangzhou 510520,China;College of Tourism,Hunan Normal University,Changsha 410081,China)
出处 《系统工程学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2022年第1期12-22,共11页 Journal of Systems Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71801053,71803029) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金资助项目(18YJC630143) 广东省基础与应用基础研究基金资助项目(2020A1515010407,2019A1515011473) 湖南省社会科学成果评审委员会资助项目(XSP18YBC215) 湖南省教育厅优秀青年资助项目(18B048)。
关键词 以旧换新 非正规回收企业 市场竞争 定价 博弈论 old-for-new informal recycling enterprises marketing competition pricing game theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献72

  • 1杨悦,鲁伟,李微敖.家电"再刺激"隐忧[J].财经,2012,15(17):108-110.
  • 2Boehret K.When the devices are done[J/OL].Wall Street Journal,[2012-5-8].
  • 3Levinthal D A,Purohit D.Durable goods and product obsolescence[J].Marketing Science,1989,8(1):35-56.
  • 4Van Ackere A,Reyniers D J.Trade-ins and introductory offers in a monopoly[J].The RAND Journal of Economics,1995,26(1):58-74.
  • 5Fudenberg D,Tirole J.Upgrades,tradeins,and buybacks[J].The RAND Journal of Economics,1998,29(2):235-258.
  • 6Robinson J.The economics of imperfect competition[M].London:Macmillan,1933.
  • 7Varian H.Price discrimination[G]//Handbook of Industrial Organization.Amsterdam:Elsevier,1989:597-654.
  • 8周垂日,吴钰,许传永,等.产品以旧换新的决策模型分析[C]//第十三届中国管理科学学术年会论文集,2011:431-434.
  • 9Purohit D.Dual distribution channels:The competition between rental agencies and dealers[J].Marketing Science,1997,16(3):228-245.
  • 10Ray S,Boyaci T,Aras N.Optimal prices and trade-in rebates for durable,remanufacturable products[J].Manufacturing & Service Operations Management,2005,7(3):208-228.

共引文献161

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部