期刊文献+

出离乱象后的“饭圈”画像--从粉丝追星实践的心理作用机制出发 被引量:6

The Picture of“Rice Circle”behind the Chaos--Starting from the Psychological Mechanism of Fans’Star Chasing Practice
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来,“饭圈”文化在偶像工业资本与网络平台的裹挟下滋生出包括互撕谩骂、应援打榜、造谣攻击在内的一系列乱象,而乱象背后潜藏的“饭圈”逻辑也已显露于公众视野之中。基于非参与型观察与深度访谈的方法可以发现,身处乱象之中的“饭圈”粉丝之所以对畸形扭曲的“饭圈”逻辑予以默认与遵从,与心理投射、社会学习及补偿机制等心理作用密不可分,“饭圈”粉丝在追星实践中的种种表现并非对“饭圈”逻辑的欣然接受,而是为了满足自身多层次的情感需求所作的权宜之计。因此,同样苦于“饭圈”乱象的“饭圈”粉丝有望在针对乱象展开的一系列举措后,重新成为与资本博弈的趣缘群体,走向狂热与理性之间的平衡,成为参与社会协同治理的网络自组织,为建构多元主体分工协作的社会治理格局贡献力量。 In recent years,the“rice circle”culture has bred a series of chaos under the coercion of in⁃dustrial capital and network platform,and the hidden“rice circle”logic behind the chaos has also been exposed to the public view.Based on the methods of non-participatory observation and in-depth inter⁃view,it can be seen that the various performances of fans of“rice circle”in the practice of star chasing are not a happy acceptance of the logic of“rice circle”,but an expedient measure to meet their multilevel emotional needs.Therefore,fans of the“rice circle”who also suffer from the chaos of the“rice cir⁃cle”are expected to become interested groups in the game with capital again after a series of measures a⁃gainst the chaos,move towards the balance between fanaticism and rationality,become a network selforganization participating in social collaborative governance,and contribute to the construction of a social governance pattern of division and cooperation among multiple subjects.
作者 彭焕萍 刘念念 PENG Huan-ping;LIU Nian-nian(School of Journalism and Communication,Hebei University,Baoding 071000,China)
出处 《河北学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第3期201-207,共7页 Hebei Academic Journal
关键词 “饭圈”乱象 “饭圈”文化 心理作用机制 社会治理 “rice circle”chaos “rice circle”culture psychological mechanism social governance
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献17

  • 1Snyder C R, Higgins R L. Excuses:Their effective role in the negotiation of reality[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1988, 104:23-35.
  • 2Higgins R L,Leibowitz R Q. Reality negotiation and coping: the social constructionof adaptive outcome[A]. Snyder C R ed. Coping: the psychology of what works[C]. New YorkOxford: Oxford University Press. 1999.20-50.
  • 3Swann W B Jr, Griffin J J Jr, Predmore S C, Gaines B. The cognitive-affectivecrossfire: When self-consistency confronts self-enhancement[J]. Journal of Personality andSocial Psychology, 1987, 52: 881-889.
  • 4Snyder C R, Samuelson B E A. Development and validation of the LIVE Scale: Linkageinto valenced elements. Unpublished manuscript. University of Kansan.
  • 5Greenberg J, Arndt J, Simon L, Pyszczynski T, Solomon S. Proximal and DistalDefenses in Response to Reminders of One's Mortality: Evidence of a Temporal Sequence[J].Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2000, 1: 91-99.
  • 6Westen D, Muderrisoglu S, Fowler C, et al. Affect regulation and affectiveexperience: Individual differences, group differences, and measurement using a Q-sortprocedure[J]. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1997, 65: 429-439.
  • 7Bramel D. A dissonance theory approach to defensive projection[J]. Journal ofAbnormal and Social Psychology, 1962, 64: 121-129.
  • 8Ross L, Greene D, Horse P. The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias insocial perception and attribution processes[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,1977, 13: 279-301.
  • 9Leonard S N, Kimberley J D, Baumeister R F. A new look at defensive projection:Thought suppression, accessibility, and biased person perception[J]. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 1997, 72: 980-1001.
  • 10Crammer P. Anger and the use of defense mechanisms in college students. Journal ofpersonality, 1991, 59: 39-55.

共引文献70

同被引文献104

引证文献6

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部