期刊文献+

健康成人白细胞表面CD64和HLA-DR相关指标参考区间的建立及其影响因素分析

Establishment of the reference intervals of leukocyte surface CD64 and HLA-DR indexes for healthy adults and related factors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的建立健康成人白细胞表面CD64和HLA-DR相关指标的参考区间,并分析其影响因素。方法选取北京大学第一医院体检中心126名22~60岁的健康成人,其中男69名,女57名。采用流式细胞术检测其白细胞表面CD64和HLA-DR表达,通过公式计算相关指标;分析年龄、性别对白细胞表面CD64和HLA-DR相关指标的影响,并建立参考区间。结果不同年龄健康成人CD64差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。18~29岁组单核细胞HLA-DR平均荧光强度低于40~49岁组和50~59岁组(P值分别为0.023、0.007),单核细胞HLADR荧光强度中位数低于50~59岁组(P=0.034)。男性与女性白细胞表面CD64和HLA-DR相关指标差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论建立了健康成人白细胞表面CD64和HLA-DR相关指标的参考区间。年龄会影响健康成人白细胞表面HLA-DR相关指标检测结果。 Objective To establish the reference intervals of leukocyte surface CD64 and HLA-DR indexes for healthy adults,and to investigate the factors on the reference intervals.Methods Totally,126 healthy subjects aged 22 to 60 years,including 69 males and 57 females,were enrolled from Peking University First Hospital.The expressions of CD64 and HLA-DR on the surface of leukocytes were determined by flow cytometry.Some related indicators were calculated through formula.The reference intervals of CD64 and HLA-DR were established.The influence of age and sex on the reference intervals was investigated.Results There was no statistical significance between different ages and CD64(P>0.05).The mean fluorescence intensity of monocyte HLA-DR in 18-29-year-old group was lower than those in 40-49-year-old and 50-59-year-old groups(P>0.05,P=0.023,P=0.007).The mean fluorescence intensity of monocyte HLA-DR in 18-29-year-old group was lower than that in 50-59-year-old group(P=0.034).There was no statistical significance in leukocyte surface CD64 and HLA-DR indexes between males and females(P>0.05).Conclusions The reference intervals of leukocyte surface CD64 and HLA-DR indexes for healthy adults have been established.Age may influence the results of leukocyte surface HLA-DR in healthy adults.
作者 苗林子 陆遥 屈晨雪 由然 龚岩 MIAO Linzi;LU Yao;QU Chenxue;YOU Ran;GONG Yan(Peking University First Hospital,Beijing 100034,China)
出处 《检验医学》 CAS 2022年第3期240-245,共6页 Laboratory Medicine
关键词 CD64 HLA-DR 参考区间 流式细胞术 CD64 HLA-DR Reference interval Flow cytometry
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献51

  • 1邵洁,黄新文,孙眉月,杜立中,汤永民,乐园罗.新生儿败血症外周血中性粒细胞CD_(64)的表达及其意义[J].中华儿科杂志,2005,43(7):510-513. 被引量:24
  • 2徐茜茜,陈灵芝,徐海滨,张宇,包曼华.CD64在新生儿感染诊断中的价值[J].临床儿科杂志,2006,24(3):185-187. 被引量:7
  • 3Davis BH. Improved diagnostic approaches to infection/ sepsis detection [ J]. Expert Rev Mol Diagn, 2005,5 (2) :193-207.
  • 4Ng PC, Li G, Chui KM, et al. Neutrophil CD64 is a sensitive diagnostic marker for early-onset neonatal infection[ J]. Pediatr Res,2004,56(5 ) :796-803.
  • 5Zhang G, Qiao S, Li Q, et al. Molecular cloning and expression of the porcine high-affinity immunoglobulin G Fc receptor (FcgammaRI)[J]. Immunogenetics, 2006, 58(10) :845-849.
  • 6Danikas DD, Karakantza M, Theodorou GL,et al. Prognostic value of phagocytic activity of neutrophils and monocytes in sepsis. Correlation to CD64 and CD14 antigen expression[J]. Clin Exp Immunol, 2008, 154 ( 1 ) : 87-97.
  • 7Allen E, Bakke AC,Purtzer MZ, et al. Neutrophil CD64 expression : distinguishing acute inflammatory autoimmune disease from systemic infections[J]. Ann Rheum Dis,2002,61 (6) : 522-525.
  • 8Davis BH,Olsen SH, Ahmad E, et al. Neutrophil CD64 is an improved indicator of infection or sepsis in emergency department patients [J].Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2006, 130 (5) :654-661.
  • 9Nuutila J, Hohenthal U, Laitinen I, et al. Simultaneous quantitative analysis of FcgammaRI (CD64) expression on neutrophils and monocytes: a new, improved way to detect infections [ J]. J Immunol Methods, 2007, 328 (1-2) : 189-200.
  • 10Zarev PV, Davis BH. Comparative study of monocyte enumeration by flow cytometry: improved detection by combining monocyte-related antibodies with anti-CD163 [J].Lab Hematol, 2004, 10(1) :24-31.

共引文献99

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部