期刊文献+

隐私、符号与资本 被引量:1

Privacy,Symbols and Capital
原文传递
导出
摘要 隐私是个人社会关系即社会符号的产物。符号单一性与人的本性和活动多样性造成的非对称性矛盾是隐私产生的本体论根源。隐私传播会损害符号利益共同体内的个人的符号与利益。但隐私交流也有增进人际关系、增强共同体意识的正面作用。以人格权保护隐私是对资本与权势共同体的符号意识形态的反抗。社会公共领域与私人领域交叉,社会分工与人本能的矛盾是隐私的社会历史根源,并在私有制市场经济社会中,发展为隐私异化。以马克思的立场方法,可以探讨隐私与符号、隐私与资本的诸多关系问题。 Privacy is the product of personal social relationships,i.e.social symbols.The asymmetrical contradiction created by symbolic singularity and the diversity of human nature and activity is the ontological root of the emergence of privacy.The spread of privacy can undermine the symbols and interests of individuals within a community of symbolic interests,but privacy based on interaction also has the positive effect of enhancing interpersonal relationships and strengthening the sense of community.The protection of privacy through personality rights is a revolt against the symbolic ideology of capital and the community of power.The intersection of society’s public and private spheres and the contradiction between the social division of labor and human instincts are the socio-historical roots of privacy.In a private market economy,this develops into privacy alienation.Using Marx’s standpoint and approach enables us to explore the many problems of the relationship between privacy and symbols and between privacy and capital.
作者 何丽野 He Liye
出处 《中国社会科学评价》 CSSCI 2022年第1期18-27,157,共11页 China Social Science Review
基金 国家社会科学基金后期资助项目“交换理性批判”(19FZXB089)阶段性成果
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献18

共引文献78

同被引文献34

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部