裁判文书上网制度的价值取向及其法理反思

Value Orientation of Judgment Documents Online System in China and Its Jurisprudential Reflection

全国统一的裁判文书上网制度自2010年开始建设,又分别于2013年和2016年进行了两次大幅度的修改。在短短6年内历经3次变化,反映出改革者对这一制度的认知局限,因此有必要对这一制度及其改革的价值取向进行梳理,并反思其背后的法理基础。通过对3个版本的裁判文书上网制度改革文本的梳理,发现裁判文书上网制度存在两种价值取向:通过立法宗旨表达出来的规范价值取向与基于合法性追求的能动价值取向。规范价值取向旨在通过裁判文书上网公开来监督司法、提高司法公信力和司法权威,而能动价值取向则通过裁判文书上网所形成的诉讼信息来参与社会诚信建设。我国现行裁判文书上网制度主要向能动价值取向倾斜,以便增加改革者所期望的合法性资源,但这并不符合社会信用的生成逻辑,同时也有悖司法权威的作用机制。未来裁判文书上网制度的调整应向其规范价值取向回归。

The national unified Judgment Documents Online System has been under construction since 2010,and has been revised in 2013 and 2016 respectively.It reflects the cognitive limitations of the reformers to it.Therefore,it is necessary to sort out the system and the value orientation of the reform,and reflect on the legal basis behind it.Through sorting out the three versions of the reform text of Judgment Documents Online System,it is found that there are two kinds of value orientations:The orientation of normative purpose expressed through legislative purpose and active purpose orientation based on legitimacy pursuit.Normative value orientation aims to improve judicial credibility and authority through online disclosure of judgment documents,while active value orientation participates in social credit construction through litigation information formed by online judgment documents.In order to increase the legitimacy resources expected by the reformers,the current Judgment Documents Online System in China mainly inclines to the latter,but it does not accord with the logic of social credit generation,and also goes against the mechanism of judicial authority.In the future,the adjustment of this system should return to its normative value orientation.