期刊文献+

美国域外数据管辖权研究 被引量:25

United States Jurisdiction over Extraterritorial Data
原文传递
导出
摘要 美国通过立法确立了以数据控制者为标准的域外数据管辖权,将美国公司在全球数据领域的优势转变为美国对域外数据的管辖权。尽管美国对域外管辖权设置了一定的限制,但是这些限制规则在很大程度上仅具有形式意义,并不能实际避免其域外管辖与数据所在地国的属地管辖发生冲突,进而严重威胁到包括中国在内的大部分国家的数据主权。中国应积极联合新兴国家与发展中国家,主动参与国际数据合作机制的创立,提升在数据管辖方面国际规则体系构建中的话语权。同时,中国应采取措施提高中国企业在全球数据领域的竞争力及规则意识,真正地应对美国的数据霸权。 The United States has published laws to establish United States jurisdiction over extraterritorial data in terms of data controllers,which turns the domination of American companies in the global data field into extraterritorial jurisdiction of the United States.Although the United States has set certain restrictions on extraterritorial jurisdiction,it cannot avoid conflicts between its extraterritorial jurisdiction and the territorial jurisdiction of the state where the data is located since those restrictions are largely a formality.It seriously threatens the data sovereignty of most countries including China.China shall also actively work with emerging countries and developing states,in order to establish an international data cooperation mechanisms which can countermeasure the United States data hegemony and promote international data governance.Meanwhile,China shall take measures to increase competitive of Chinese companies in the global data market and their spirit of rule of law in order to truly reverse domination of United States data power.
作者 杨永红 Yang Yonghong
出处 《法商研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第2期146-157,共12页 Studies in Law and Business
基金 司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目(19SFB2057)。
关键词 数据主权 域外管辖 立法管辖权 执法管辖权 中间人 控制者 data sovereignty extraterritorial jurisdiction prescriptive jurisdiction enforcement jurisdiction intermediaries controllers
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献42

  • 1程卫东.跨境数据流动的法律监管[J].政治与法律,1998(3):72-76. 被引量:19
  • 2郭玉军,向在胜.网络案件中美国法院的长臂管辖权[J].中国法学,2002(6):155-168. 被引量:43
  • 3Jo Shaw,Law of the European Union(3rd)[M].Palgrave MacMillan,2000.
  • 4T.Burgenthal,“Self-excuting and Non-self-excuting treaties in National and international law”[M].Recueil des Cours 1992-Ⅳ.
  • 5Steinhardt,“the Role of International law as a Canon of Domestic Statutory Construction?”[M].VandLRev1103,1990,43.
  • 6Gerrit Betlem and Andre Nolkaemper,Giving effect to public international law and European law before domestic Courts--A comparative analysis of the practice of consistent interpretation[M].14(3)EJIL(2003).
  • 7Paul Cragic,Grainne de Burca,EU Law Text,Cases,and Materials[M].Oxford University Press,2003.
  • 8Karen Knop,Here and There:International Law in Domestic Courts[J].Ⅴ.32 (2000),New York University,Journal of International law & Politics.
  • 9A.O' Neill,Presentation at Conference 'Enforcing Community law before national courts ten years of Francovich'[M].Trier,Academy of European Law,14 May 2001.
  • 10Maria Fletcher,Extending “indirect effect” to the third pillar:the significance of Pupino[M].(2005)30 E.L.Rev.Dec.Sweet & Maxwell and Contributions 2005.

共引文献107

引证文献25

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部