期刊文献+

目的国签证限制对中国出口贸易的影响--基于6位数HS编码产品的检验

The impact of Destination Countries’Visa Restriction on China’s Export:Evidence Based on 6-digit HS-code Products
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章检验了目的国签证限制对中国产品出口的阻碍效应。签证限制会增加贸易成本,从而阻碍国际贸易。参照Neumayer(2011)和Umana-Dajud(2019)的做法,文章以目的国是否要求中国公民获得签证许可才能入境作为签证限制的代理变量,基于1996—2013年CEPII-BACI产品贸易数据和DEMIG签证政策数据,实证检验发现目的国的签证限制显著阻碍了中国产品的出口贸易。通过对国家人均收入水平的检验发现,高收入国家的签证限制带来的出口阻碍作用明显超过低收入国家;分产品差异化程度的检验则发现,目的国签证限制对中国同质化产品出口的阻碍作用超过差异化产品;而分产品技术密集度的检验发现,中、高技术密集型产品受到出口阻碍效应大于低技术产品。文章还发现:提高签证便利化程度,有利于降低目的国签证限制对中国产品出口的负面影响。本文的研究结论为中国制定签证便利化政策,为助力对外贸易高质量发展提供了良好的政策参考。 This paper investigates the hinder effect of destination countries’visa restriction on China’s export.Visa restriction will increase trade cost and hinder international trade.Following Neumayer(2011),Umana-Dajud(2019),this paper measures visa restriction according to the fact whether Chinese citizens are required visa permit to enter a country,empirically finds that visa restriction significantly reduces export value of Chinese products.The paper also finds that visa restriction of rich countries has a larger effect in hindering China’s export,and the hinder-effect is larger for homogenous products,medium and high technology-intensive products.Further test finds that the hinder-effect could be reduced by improving visa facilitation.The conclusion of this paper has important policy implications for China in making visa facilitation policy and help high-quality development of China’s foreign trade.
作者 陈乘风 Chen Chengfeng(ST Century Maritime Silk Road Research Centre,Huaqia University,Xiamen 361021)
机构地区 华侨大学
出处 《上海经济》 2022年第2期27-40,共14页 Shanghai Economy
基金 2020年福建省社科规划社科研究基地重大项目海外华商企业助力“一带一路”建设的机制与路径研究(FJ2020MJDZ013)。
关键词 签证限制政策 签证便利化 产品出口 Visa Restriction Policy Visa Facilitation Product Export
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献56

  • 1白家骆.国际贸易与地理环境[J].国外人文地理,1988,3(2):66-70. 被引量:2
  • 2杨鸿玺,陈开明.中国对外援助:成就、教训和良性发展[J].国际展望,2010,2(1):46-56. 被引量:29
  • 3黄梅波.中国对外援助机制:现状和趋势[J].国际经济合作,2007(6):4-11. 被引量:56
  • 4Baldwin, R. , Harrigan, J.. Zeros, Quality, and Space : Trade Theory and Trade Evidence. American Economic Journal: Mieroeconom- ics2011,3(2) :60-88.
  • 5Bastos, P. ,Silva, J.. Networks, Firms, and Trade. Journal of international Economics,2012,87(2) : 352-64.
  • 6Berkowitz, D. , Moenius, J. , Pistor, K.. Trade, Law, and Product Complexity. Review of Economics and Statistics,2006,88 ( 2 ) : 363-73.
  • 7Bouet, A. , Roy, D.. Trade Protection and Tax Evasion : Evidence from Kenya, Mauritius, and Nigeria. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development ,2012,21 (2) : 287-320.
  • 8Bustos, P.. Trade Liberalization, Exports, and Technology Upgrading: Evidence on the Impact of Mercosur on Argentinian Firms. American Economic Review,2011,101 ( 1 ) : 304 -40.
  • 9Ferrantino, M. J. , Liu, X. P. , Wang, Z.. Evasion Behaviors of Exporters and Importers : Evidence from the U. S. -China Trade Data Dis- crepancy. Journal of international Economics ,2012,86 ( 1 ) : 141-57.
  • 10Fisman, R. , Wei, S. J.. Tax Rates and Tax Evasion : Evidence from "Missing Imports" in China. Journal of Political Economy,2004,112 (2) : 471-96.

共引文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部