摘要
叶荣钟先生的思想,可分为三个层面:一是在文学层面,以中国新文学为参照,提出“第三文学”的观念,主张面向大众的启蒙式论述,继而以汉诗的政治对殖民统治地区的文化取向进行了批评;二是在历史层面,回顾日据时期的民族运动经验和社会经济状况,完成《日据下台湾政治社会运动史》《近代台湾金融经济发展史》《台湾人物群像》等著作,建构了抵抗殖民的社会文化史观;三是在世界层面,基于对战后世界演变的观察,从第三世界的立场出发,生发出文明史观的视野,完成了对台湾悲情史观的超越。以上思想的展开,打通了日据时期和战后的抗争经验,对于台湾的民族主义问题作出了富于历史深度的回答。在叶荣钟看来,台湾地区民族主义属于中华民族主义的范畴,由此打开了文明的视野。他对于中华文明的期待,不仅表现于日据时期的祖国情怀,也表现在战后对于世界局势的观察分析之中。
Mr. Ye Rongzhong’s thoughts can be divided into three levels: first, at the literary level, taking Chinese new literature as the reference, he put forward the concept of “third literature”, advocated the enlightenment discussion facing the public, and then criticized the cultural orientation of the colony with the politics of Chinese poetry;Second, at the historical level, he reviewed the experience of national movements and socio-economic conditions during the Japanese occupation period, completed works such as The History of Political and Social Movements in Taiwan under the Japanese Occupation, The History of Modern Taiwan’s Financial and Economic Development, and The Portraits of Taiwan Figures, and constructed the social and historical views of anti-colonialism;Third, at the world level, basing on the observation of the post-war evolution, from the standpoint of the third world, he developed the vision of the historical view of civilization and completed the transcendence of the historical view of Taiwan’s sadness. The development of the above ideas opened up the experience of resistance during the colonial period and after the war, and made a historical and in-depth answer to the issues of nationalism in Taiwan. In Ye Rongzhong’s view, nationalism in Taiwan belongs to the category of Chinese nationalism, which opens the vision of civilization. His expectation of Chinese civilization is reflected not only in the feelings of the motherland during the Japanese occupation, but also in the observation and analysis of the world situation after the war.
出处
《海峡人文学刊》
2022年第1期113-123,159,共12页
Journal of Humanities Across the Straits
基金
中国社会科学院创新工程项目“中国文学的现代转型与中国经验研究”。