元认知疗法与元认知训练的回顾与展望

Review and prospect of metacognitive therapy and metacognitive training

目的了解元认知疗法和元认知训练的研究现状、研究热点和关键文献特征,探究二者研究路径上的异同及未来研究方向。方法利用CiteSpace软件对Web of Science数据库2011年-2020年收录的以“元认知疗法”和“元认知训练”为主题的文献进行可视化分析。结果①元认知疗法研究中的核心和高被引作者均为Adrian Wells,元认知训练研究中的核心和高被引作者均为Steffen Moritz,而Aaron T Beck则是在两种技术研究中都出现的高被引作者;②研究热点分析表明,元认知疗法和元认知训练研究都主要体现在“技术的成熟与拓展”“技术的效果评估与检验”以及“技术间的对比分析”;③关键文献特征分析表明,二者均涉及“效果”“有效性”“元分析”“变式”这四个方面。结论2011年-2020年元认知疗法和元认知训练的研究均凸显出各自的核心研究者,在研究热点和关键文献特征上既存在相同之处,又各具特点。

Objective To analyze the current research status,research hotspots and main features of the literature related to metacognitive therapy and metacognitive training,and to explore the similarities and differences in research approaches of the two intervention techniques and their research directions in the future.Methods Citespace-based visualization analysis was carried out on the relevant literature of"metacognitive therapy"and"metacognitive training"published in 2011-2020 in the Web of Science database.Results①Adrian Wells was the core author and the author of highly cited papers in the research field of metacognitive therapy.Steffen Moritz is the core author and the author of highly cited papers in the research field of metacognitive training.Aaron T Beck was a highly cited researcher in both fields.②The analysis of research hotspots showed that the two intervention techniques were mainly reflected in the"maturity and expansion of techniques","the evaluation and testing of the effects of techniques"and"the comparative analysis of techniques".③The key literature characteristics analysis showed that both techniques involved the aspects of"effectiveness","validity","meta-analysis"and"variation".Conclusion Both metacognitive therapy and metacognitive training studies in 2011-2020 highlight their respective core researchers,with similarities and distinctive features in terms of research hotspots and key literature features.