论古籍点校成果邻接权保护模式

Research on the Protection Mode of Adjacency Right of AncientBooks’ Proofreading Achievements

古籍点校成果是否满足作品的可版权性要求在实践和学理上尚有争议,在司法实践中,法院对于古籍点校成果有作为民事权益受民法保护、构成作品受著作权法保护、非独创性表达不构成作品等不同认定。根据混同原则由于古籍点校成果趋于极为有限的表达方式而不受著作法保护;文章断句与校正文字等点校成果创作空间有限、缺乏创作长度、创作高度不足并不符合独创性标准;从创作意图角度古籍点校目的在于复原事实而并非整理出新的作品。古籍点校成果不满足作品的构成要件。为了保护倾注了大量智力劳动的古籍点校成果,可以借鉴引入欧洲多国设立的“科学版本的邻接权”保护制度。

It is still controversial in practice and theory whether the proofreading achievements of ancient books meet the requirements of copyrightable works.In judicial practice,the court has different opinions on the proofreading achievements of ancient books.As a civil right,it is protected by civil law,as a constituent work,it is protected by copyright law,but as a non original expression it is not regarded as a work.According to the principle of confusion,the proofreading of ancient books are not protected by the copyright law because of the limited way of expression.The creation space of proofreading achievements such as sentence breaking and text correction is limited and insufficient,which does not meet the standard of originality;From the perspective of creation intention,the purpose of proofreading ancient books is to recover facts rather than to sort out new works.The proofreading of ancient books does not satisfy the composing requirement of works.In order to protect the proofreading achievements of ancient books,which require a lot of intellectual labor,we can learn from the protection system of“adjacency rights of scientific editions”established by many European countries.