期刊文献+

出口企业更清洁吗?——基于微观企业数据的再考察

Are Exporters More Environmentally Friendly? New Evidences from China’s Firm-level Data
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于工业企业数据及环境统计数据,构建1998-2007年面板数据实证分析出口对企业二氧化硫排放强度的影响。回归结果显示:相较于非出口企业,出口企业二氧化硫排放强度较低;企业出口强度越高,二氧化硫排放强度越低。异质性分析发现:企业所属行业及企业所在地区差异均会对二氧化硫排放强度产生影响。具体表现为,污染密集型制造业行业中,出口企业比非出口企业更为清洁;相较于其他地区而言,东部地区企业出口对二氧化硫排放强度的降低幅度更为显著。在排除两控区环境规制因素对回归结果的影响,并且通过IV(2SLS)及倾向得分匹配-双重差分(PSM-DID)等方法处理内生性问题后,本文的回归结果依然稳健。机制分析表明:出口企业一方面通过提高新产品产值——R&D;另一方面通过提高全要素生产率,降低了企业的二氧化硫排放强度。此外,通过比较企业出口状态和出口强度的改变发现,出口企业二氧化硫排放强度低的主要驱动因素在于广延边际而非集约边际。 Based on the data of industrial enterprises and environmental statistics from 1998 to 2007,the panel data were constructed,and the impact of export on the SO_(2) emissions intensity was empirically analyzed.Compared with non-exporters,the SO_(2) emissions intensity of exporters is lower;the higher the export intensity of enterprises,the lower the SO_(2) emissions intensity.Enterprise’s export has a heterogeneity impact on SO_(2) emissions intensity for enterprises that are located in different regions or belonging to different industries.For the enterprises in pollution intensive manufacturing industries,the exporters are cleaner than non-exporters.The negative impact of enterprise’s export on SO_(2) emissions intensity in the eastern region is more significant than that in other regions.After excluding the influence of environmental regulation factors on the regression results,and through IV and PSM-DID methods to deal with endogenous problems,the regression results of this paper are still robust.The mechanism analysis shows that:on the one hand,export enterprises reduce SO_(2) emissions intensity by increasing the output value of new products-R&D,on the other hand,by improving total factor productivity.In addition,by comparing the change of export status(extensive margin)and the change of export intensity(intensive margin),it is found that the main driving factor of low SO_(2) emissions intensity of export enterprises lies in the extensive margin rather than the intensive margin.
作者 于安琪 刘冠坤 杨超 Yu Anqi;Liu Guankun;Yang Chao(School of Public Policy and Management,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China;School of International Trade and Economics,University of International Business and Economics,Beijing 100029,China;National Institute of International Strategy,Beijing 100007,China)
出处 《技术经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第4期176-187,共12页 Journal of Technology Economics
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目“加快构建开放型经济新常态下国际经贸新规则研究”(16ZDA036) 国家自然科学基金面上项目“追溯中国在全球生产网络中的碳排放:基于微观数据改进的IO表与GEM模型”(41675139) 国家自然科学基金面上项目“全球价值链视角下中国地区及行业真实增加值与真实生产率核算及其决定因素与政策分析框架研究”(71873075)。
关键词 出口状态 出口强度 二氧化硫排放强度 工具变量法 倾向得分匹配-双重差分(PSM-DID) export status export intensity SO_(2)emissions intensity IV method PSM-DID
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献318

  • 1王猛,王有鑫,许春招.国际贸易影响能源效率吗?——基于省际面板数据的研究[J].现代管理科学,2013,1(5):78-80. 被引量:9
  • 2张宇.外资企业股权结构与FDI技术外溢效应——理论与实证[J].世界经济研究,2006(11):65-71. 被引量:13
  • 3吴延兵.R&D与生产率——基于中国制造业的实证研究[J].经济研究,2006,41(11):60-71. 被引量:401
  • 4占超群 代谦.《为出口而进口?中国进出口关系的实证分析》[J].发展经济学论坛,2010,.
  • 5戴觅、余淼杰(2012):《企业出口前研发投入、出口及生产率进步》,北京大学工作论文.
  • 6杨汝岱、熊瑞祥(2011):《干中学与中国工业企业出口生产率》,湘潭大学工作论文.
  • 7杨汝岱、郑辛迎(2011):《垂直专业化对员工工资的差异化影响》,湘潭大学工作论文.
  • 8Bai, Chong-En;Lu, Jiangyong and Tao, Zhigang. "How does Privatization Work in China?" Journal of Comparative Economics, 2009, 37, pp. 453 - 470.
  • 9Brandt, Loren;Biesebroeck, Johannes Van and Zhang, Yifan. "Creative Accounting or Creative Destruction? Finn-level Productivity Growth in Chinese Manufacturing. " Journal of Developmen~ Economies, 2012, 97 (2), pp. 339-351.
  • 10Cai, Hongbin and Liu, Qiao. "Competition and Corporate Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Chinese Industrial Finns. "Economic Journal, 2009, 119, pp. 764-795.

共引文献2750

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部