摘要
本文针对"泛化的与本意的'自组织'"—文中的一些观点进行商榷。对文章中关于哈肯自组织定义的思考进行评析,阐明了自组织是一个科学概念,不能与日常用语"自我组织"混为一谈。进一步分析了自组织与他组织之间的关系以及自组织过程的三种类型,肯定了组织的构建过程可以划分为自组织或他组织,并且这种分类并不改变自组织的科学内涵。
The some of opinion in the article of stretched and originated selfor ganization were discussed in this paper Remarking on thinking about definition of selforganization of Harken in the articleThat selforganization is a scientific definition was explained and could not be confused with the self organization of everyday expressions The relationships between selforganization and heterorganization and three types of the process of selforganization were analyzed It was affirmative that scientific connotation of the definition of selforganization could not changed when the process of the construction organization was classified into selforganization or heterorganization
出处
《自然辩证法研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2002年第11期23-25,共3页
Studies in Dialectics of Nature