期刊文献+

从常态到应急态过程中的学习机制——基于口岸海关疫情防控政策的案例分析 被引量:4

Learning Mechanism in the Transferring from Normal to Emergency State——Case Analysis Based on Epidemic Prevention and Control Policies of Customs at Ports
原文传递
导出
摘要 政策系统面对外部环境的信息输入通常能够做出的及时反馈和学习,其应急响应能力短时间内可以快速提升。新冠肺炎疫情在全球大规模暴发,我国政策系统在经历了初期短暂不协调响应后,逐步控制疫情,全国疫情防控工作快速进入常态化阶段。这一成绩既得益于政策系统自上而下的强大执行能力,也反映出政策主体在高度不确定性过程中的快速学习能力。本文选取位于疫情防控核心之一的首都机场海关作为个案,参与式观察与深度访谈支持过程跟踪,探索疫情防控政策在执行过程中如何发生学习并做出调整。以政策主体和信息来源两个变量为基础,本文梳理出政策执行中学习的四种类型。研究发现,以疫情防控领导小组为代表的中央化决策机制压缩了从中央到地方的执行链。同时,在应急态下,政策参与主体能动性显著增强且系统信息流通加速。西方学者认为,缺乏外部竞争和参与决策的机会有限会导致信息反馈环节不顺畅,容易导致政策冲突累积到危险水平。本文发现,中国政策系统中的学习机制能够很好地调适政策执行过程中的不适,在应急态下这一结论更为明显。 Policy systems are usually able to make timely feedback and learn from information input,and the capacity of emergency response can be rapidly improved in a short period of time.After a brief initial uncoordinated response to the massive global outbreak of COVID-19,China’s policy system has gradually brought the epidemic under control,and the national epidemic prevention and control work has returned the normalization.This improvement not only benefits from the strong top-down execution ability of the policy system but also reflects the learning ability of policy actors in the face of high uncertainty.In this paper,the Customs Office of Capital Airport in Beijing,one of the centers of epidemic prevention and control,was selected as a case to explore how to learn and adjust epidemic prevention and control policies in the implementation process through participatory observation and in-depth interview method.Drawing on two variables of policy actor and information input,this paper categorizes four types of learning in policy implementation.It finds that the centralized decision-making mechanism represented by the leading group for epidemic prevention and control shorted the information chain from central to local.At the same time,the dynamic of policy participants is significantly enhanced in emergency management,and the information flow is accelerated.Previous scholars believe that the lack of external competition and the limited access to decision-making will lead to poor information flow,which will easily lead to the accumulation of policy conflicts to a dangerous level.This paper finds that the learning mechanism in China’s policy system can well adjust the policy implementation process,especially in emergency management.
作者 刘一弘 田昊玮 Liu Yihong;Tian Haowei(School of Public Administration and Policy,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872)
出处 《中国行政管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第3期115-125,共11页 Chinese Public Administration
基金 中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)“从新冠肺炎疫情防控的北京实践中“总结经验”——危机学习的视角”(编号:22XNA009) 国家自然科学基金面上项目“重大突发事件触发政策优化的机理与路径分析”(编号:72174201)。
关键词 不确定性 政策执行 政策学习 危机学习 uncertainty policy implementation policy learning crisis learning
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献49

  • 1王正毅.理解中国转型:国家战略目标、制度调整与国际力量[J].世界经济与政治,2005(6):7-14. 被引量:16
  • 2傅勇,张晏.中国式分权与财政支出结构偏向:为增长而竞争的代价[J].管理世界,2007,23(3):4-12. 被引量:1749
  • 3陈振明.政策科学:公共政策分析导论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004:256.
  • 4王汉生、刘世定、孙立平.《作为制度运作和制度变迁方式的变通》,应星等编.《中国社会学文选》,北京:中国人民大学出版社,2011年.
  • 5斯蒂芬·戈德史密斯、盛廉·1)·埃格斯蔷,孙迎春译:《网络化治理:公共部门的新形态》,北京:北京大学出版社,2008年,“前言”第7页.
  • 6Pressman,J.L.&Wildavsky,A.Implementation:How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland.Berkeley:University of California Press,1973.
  • 7Hogwood,B.W.& Lewis A.Gunn.Policy Analysis for the Real World.Oxford:Oxford University Press,1984.
  • 8Lipsky,M.Street-level Bureaucracy.New York:Russell Sage Foundation,1980.
  • 9Smith,T.B.The Policy Implementation Process.Policy Sciences,1973(4):202.
  • 10Winter,S.Studying Implementation of Top-Down Policy From the Bottom Up:Implementation of Danish Youth Employment Policy,in R.C.Rist,ed.,Finding Work:Cross-National Perspectiveson Employment and Training.London:The Falmer,1986.

同被引文献77

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部