期刊文献+

证据选择与归纳确证 被引量:6

Evidence Selecting and Inductive Confirmation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 确证假说的证据是归纳确证中不可忽视的重要因素,证据的选择具有归纳逻辑视野的程序与规则。证据具有特定的经验内容,但在表达形式上又是一种语句;某语句被确认为相关假说的证据,既取决于个人对该语句及其竞争语句的主观概率评价,还取决于证据语句集的逻辑一致性;证据选择与证据的效用密不可分,而证据效用度在一定程度上体现了主观期望效用的测度。因此,何种语句可选作证据,何种语句优先选作证据,均需要确证活动的操作者依据一定的规则和程序来确认。 Evidence that confirms hypothesis is an important element that can't be neglected The selecting of evidence has its procedures and rules under the view of inductive logic Evidence has specific experimental contents, but it is also a sentence in expression form That some sentence is approved as evidence of relevant hypothesis is not only decided upon individual's subjective probability estimation on this sentence and its competitive ones but also upon the logical consistency of the evidence sentence class Though evidence selection and evidence function are intimate and can't be separated, the function degree of evidence expresses the measure of subjective expectation function at certain degree So that which kind of sentence can be selected as evidence and which kind of sentence has the individuals who are conducting confirmation according to some rules and procedures
作者 张大松
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2002年第11期53-55,60,共4页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词 证据选择 归纳确证 归纳逻辑 理论确证 证据确认 证据效用度 Key words:inductive logic theory confirmation evidence selection evidence approval
  • 相关文献

同被引文献43

引证文献6

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部