摘要
在中央“双减”政策背景下,课外补习市场正逐渐从培训机构转移到私人家教。家教活动隐蔽性较强、功利应试色彩较浓、逐利性特征明显,存在无序发展的风险。若不能及时加以规范,或将消减“双减”政策的实效性:加重家庭经济负担,增加学生学业负担,加剧教育系统内卷,损害群体教育公平。规范私人家教,应处理好国家监管、个体选择与教育规律间的矛盾及张力,凸显合法性、选择性与有序性三大价值向度。
Under the national“Double Reduction”policy,the extracurricular tutoring market is undergoing transformation from institutional training to private tutoring.At present,private tutoring is facing risks of disorder because of its informal nature,examination orientation,and profit-making orientation.Without timely regulation,the development of private tutoring might produce negative effects on the implementation of“Double Reduction”policy,such as:increasing familiesfinancial burdens;increasing studentsacademic burdens;aggravating educational competitions;and damaging educational equity.The approaches of regulating private tutoring are based on the balance of state power,individual choice,and rule of education.To this end,it is important to follow three essential value principles,including maintaining legitimacy,freedom of choice,and order of educational market.
作者
余晖
胡劲松
YU Hui;HU Jinsong
出处
《现代教育论丛》
2022年第2期29-36,110,共9页
Modern Education Review
关键词
双减
学业负担
校外培训
私人家教
“Double Reduction”policy
Academic burden
Extracurricular tutoring
Private tutoring